Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name

[Milton L Mueller <[e-mail]>]

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> The license in the CWG proposal is reasonable under the circumstances
> except perhaps for the exclusive part.  Personally, I don't think it's worth
> making a lot of stink about the trademark or domain name.  What matters is
> where the root servers get their zones, the RIRs their IPs and ASNs, and the
> nerds their parameters, not what the name or logo on the web site is.
> 

I don't think the ICG chair's message should be interpreted as an invitation to revisit the issue here. It is merely a notification that ICG is attempting to coordinate the approaches that have already been taken by this working group, the CRISP team, and the CWG. 

Two of those three have taken a compatible approach, the third (CWG) has not. For now, the ball is in the CWG's court, it has to decide whether to make its proposal compatible with CRISP's/IANAPLAN's or to do something else (and this aspect of the CWG proposal is recognized as incomplete). This list, imho, should just wait for CWG to respond.  

--MM