IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] IANA transition and US government budget

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 23 May 2016 22:49 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC5312DBFC for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0xWdRkI76f4g for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22f.google.com (mail-pf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 332ED12DBF8 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id b124so11949512pfb.0 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ePei8BEEauhZn5gfl3Xvq58QLbHbeQYXEht9JZWLmr8=; b=yGOX9vac8IlLDiXzEMPhGeq5Et2ljSR3Qgd3mXAcwn/yRLxoYMMoq3EeZcDGWBAGF+ 8skaCDnOAjrUW2BBpNAhg1toRQe7lF0TzOQtmbQl5mqdyfODhcNPhXGIlEkzcuquoJqF x1wJhOIOrbTpii42/yLQXQsDpef4rhiK+Bgtm2dJdqYwVhjm4DJvNNoHdYdl0EFN/LHD WAQhoY7xWEeYyToCd5p5ACjOORFbKi/2ER/cQAbrill2XqI5WfF92nDzM8yZ8jYZUsq6 pMSIpFFNEErA8mvtqUcuUnfnfpF9TaLdqqjODcb3F4zYFgtxRvbQZm9BhaQs9Eq+JgCs VIiA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ePei8BEEauhZn5gfl3Xvq58QLbHbeQYXEht9JZWLmr8=; b=V76ARObywcCNgsvwHNT/KFASqG24MwOsX1pggxolvvW3G/qxvu/rWYiNqgzxurKTKT phZZqYexUF1OoVbmsvF34GTLuYxkHSMLEKoooC+EgUr8Vbdsz3S0EJwrGwOaXT7W1geb WoYXWWLeeBz2LD+7chgPHk50wmNM8THLINItJ+tvlctbdhUc8PUvlUkqRM4zWCNkyzge Jr+nlqdW/mdxu9jbQpYR0aZDIDX/11YGFxISvbwdHcorg+pdt28YRtC/9CqCB8Rj2i10 zoXHigbGzGfk1it9sfmVzj4wnEpXvm1JI/j07pg6J06LdBhJrKNdqBR65xTR7YZl85hF 9gpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKX6mM8+JEhDvyetNPrJOWuygKDLdGmBPxT6p2OxzJgpwjAbP9arqZnZCYUe8PmXg==
X-Received: by 10.98.72.27 with SMTP id v27mr1797882pfa.143.1464043785673; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:5038:1:152f:4f07:edf6:7b96? ([2406:e007:5038:1:152f:4f07:edf6:7b96]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a5sm49182804pat.19.2016.05.23.15.49.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 23 May 2016 15:49:44 -0700 (PDT)
To: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>, ianaplan@ietf.org
References: <005c01d1b4c2$2aa53420$7fef9c60$@ch> <2a26beaa-5a39-0d4e-bade-4d672defbb04@gmail.com> <67c2ffc5-c815-4ef2-77b8-01d97ca8540d@meetinghouse.net>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <6a0072fe-1e21-53de-5987-529db82f81fb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 10:49:45 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <67c2ffc5-c815-4ef2-77b8-01d97ca8540d@meetinghouse.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/Txbda_UHI8T8SawC-a8D9CqsRmo>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] IANA transition and US government budget
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 22:49:48 -0000

On 24/05/2016 09:27, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> On 5/23/16 4:46 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> On 23/05/2016 19:10, Richard Hill wrote:
>>> According to a blog post that I saw, the US Congress has again stated in the
>>> approved budget for the Federal Government that NTIA cannot spend any money
>>> on the IANA transition, and this until August 2017.
>>>
>>> 1) Does anybody on this list know if the above is correct?
>>>
>>> 2) Does anybody on this list know whether that would prevent the transition
>>> from taking place in 2016?
>> Even if it happened, I don't see why the transition needs even one penny
>> of USG money. If so, what am I missing?
>>
>>      Brian
> 
> NTIA has to review and approve the transition, otherwise IANA continues to operate under contract to the USG or things go into a
> really strange limbo.

I'm quite sure that a review can be performed without needing a line in the budget.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email