Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process

John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org> Wed, 21 January 2015 23:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jcurran@istaff.org>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79511A8A7E for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:21:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JltD9GqiZ9-R for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:21:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp6.ore.mailhop.org (smtp6.ore.mailhop.org [54.149.35.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59C361A19F8 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:21:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [64.129.1.11] (helo=[172.20.7.122]) by smtp6.ore.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <jcurran@istaff.org>) id 1YE4at-0001x7-Q2; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:21:51 +0000
X-Mail-Handler: DuoCircle Outbound SMTP
X-Originating-IP: 64.129.1.11
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@duocircle.com (see https://support.duocircle.com/support/solutions/articles/5000540958-duocircle-standard-smtp-abuse-information for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19KoTugQ+mnRme39uNSWs0k
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_35F4613D-1A9D-434F-9C5F-24EC304AAB02"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
In-Reply-To: <F8FC64C8-6FC7-4672-B18B-46DF993A653A@cooperw.in>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:21:50 -1000
Message-Id: <A7876535-3A8E-49AE-8303-385536D5135C@istaff.org>
References: <C172BBB7-9BA4-4BA7-848C-C7FE5B66CBF7@cooperw.in> <F8FC64C8-6FC7-4672-B18B-46DF993A653A@cooperw.in>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/WxwzAgMYAJCjHrkcoVuhkAaZwys>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:21:54 -0000

Noted - I do not plan on following up, as the ICG group is a large and diverse 
group of intelligent folks; i.e. more than capable of exploring the merits of the 
stated positions on their own.

Best,
/John

On Jan 21, 2015, at 12:59 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>; wrote:
> 
> There have been some follow-up messages:
> 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/index.html <http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/index.html>
> 
> 
> On Jan 19, 2015, at 6:33 AM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in <mailto:alissa@cooperw.in>> wrote:
> 
>> After draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response was submitted to the ICG, the ICG received the following comment: http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00017.html <http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00017.html>_______________________________________________
>> Ianaplan mailing list
>> Ianaplan@ietf.org <mailto:Ianaplan@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan