Re: [Ianaplan] What's happening at ICANN?

John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org> Sun, 18 October 2015 06:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jcurran@istaff.org>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548E31B2D5E for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fNLB4ps8Sowz for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pmta2.delivery5.ore.mailhop.org (pmta2.delivery5.ore.mailhop.org [54.186.218.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F40991B2D5D for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.128.249.177] (unknown [193.120.146.54]) by outbound2.ore.mailhop.org (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPSA; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 06:23:24 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.0 \(3094\))
From: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
In-Reply-To: <561E3BDD.4020502@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 07:23:11 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C1018DCA-CEBF-4FE7-82A0-F9591CE38B79@istaff.org>
References: <56181181.50002@gmail.com> <D23F19BE.27A31A%Jonne.soininen@nsn.com> <561D47DD.2010704@acm.org> <CAF4+nEHDxq1fgAqdb5Kwe6cNn9uK5jS2+wnNVXRFpLY44+Y=4g@mail.gmail.com> <561E3BDD.4020502@acm.org>
To: avri@acm.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3094)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/XQvL8SnawdTxsLh_5AXj0kRwX60>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] What's happening at ICANN?
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 06:23:16 -0000

On Oct 14, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>; wrote:
> ...
> All I was trying to say was IETF had a binding appeals tracks that ICANN
> does not have.

Indeed.   The appeals process is rather logical, allowing for appeal regarding
whether the Internet standards procedures were properly followed, and (in the 
extreme case) appeal to the ISOC Trustees “only in cases in which the procedures 
themselves are claimed to be inadequate or insufficient to the protection of the 
rights of all parties in a fair and open Internet Standards Process.”   

Such clarity of role might be helpful in the names community processes...
/John