Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep context in mind Re: Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal review

[JFC Morfin <[e-mail]>]

At 20:03 24/08/2015, Eliot Lear wrote:
>>So this group should not make a comment that can be understood as a 
>>comment on the other parts of the proposal.
>
>Fundamentally the question is the same: do we believe the proposal 
>should go forward or not?

Richard,

the point is not to tell the truth. The truth is that the affinity 
group believes and has decided that Dilma's friends should control 
the internet. Money first. You cannot change that.

This is not a big issue, however, if you accept that the internet+web 
are only two overlay network strata above the catenet of the people 
digital resources - that are politically and operationnally protected 
in being tied together by ITU members.


What we are confronted to is the end of long standing BUG they still 
try to make survive as a feature. The real problem, and it is not an 
easy one, is the transition from the IETF to the ITU-I (which to has 
to get an international charter first, along something like the 
Supreme Court's position.)

The Juges understood the Google & co API trick very well. The problem 
is that you cannot really trust the USG, the States, the people, even 
the Juges of the leading nation, etc. to win against ICANN/GAFAM and 
digital allies easily. Mostly because it is not easy for anyone to be 
sure he/she understands the interests of his/her would-be friends and 
could-be ennemies.

My rule of thumb is the WSIS one: to be on the users/people legal 
side. And in order to be sure of that, to really be one of them. A 
non-profit local digital service provider. I may be wrong and my 
architectural adaptation can be limited. However there are many 
others having better ideas than me. This is why, nothing should be 
considered which has not been "x-libed" first. Openly considered and 
experimented along an XLIBRE approach.

The network must be money neutral, i.e. you should be able to 
buy/sell any valued added service, encouraging innovaton, but the 
money MUST have the same value. loyal operations. One GAFAM Dollar 
MUST equal everyone else's Dollar. This was protected by technology 
and IAB in the initial NTIA schema. Now they want the technology and 
IAB to be an ICANN customer. Next, they will want the ITU to be an 
ICANN customer too.

jfc