IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Fri, 07 November 2014 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462A81A1B1A for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 12:55:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gFcMMFwovSBw for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 12:55:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com (mail-pa0-f41.google.com [209.85.220.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B806A1A1B1D for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 12:55:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id rd3so4242755pab.14 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:55:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=CmK6W6mtFQw+Ie2N41zjXtUKf8UthFr2DQcjHtHnVvs=; b=QLTSqtaL9AOJXujiX/eGc1MnqMxb2ChWtw4DlB29RzFjDZydCAQtybBfVp3WJK8dyQ 05RR+PEG0H2JmSV96Pu34gdi6LRBeGHA9yjtZ/5Zcp7xH1Jv7GcG7Cxzw68oxRqMQa+C SXmAp2iDsl4vK7h2cO2UyKGxhrYKv5u9+qCni1cDwibxHU7a/PIJUNa5cr7t0vHod4RY 0P3jj1TKtizbaLN8zDIJqwcZHpR1/4WQueLi1N9/wsoRrv2rcjrWyFqR3fAWUGDn5HMy fJHamrc+TZU/PiNxs5jSVnneW7T8PT2kjaQVMkU4i1KoB5rv9fdg+D1RcsIaeDM7bMWy ZtqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkYL4M1OTICchvNp3yBVeqQiMH8PmUJR1P4MJCgU+i+q2AjXRvZMxyVShD72olngaajSLn1
X-Received: by 10.70.35.111 with SMTP id g15mr14490566pdj.155.1415393734420; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:55:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2605:e000:1102:4026:4599:84cc:4f94:a316? ([2605:e000:1102:4026:4599:84cc:4f94:a316]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ub7sm9598482pbc.30.2014.11.07.12.55.32 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:55:33 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_ACC1666E-F6E8-47BC-AED3-6B847BB832BB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <6e19bf2618a54b27bb1b859842e98144@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:55:23 -1000
Message-Id: <89E194B2-726A-440F-814D-8BC91D8C82D3@virtualized.org>
References: <54594A50.4090305@meetinghouse.net> <20141105001731.GA30186@mx1.yitter.info> <54597BDB.7040305@meetinghouse.net> <5459BA98.1070006@gmail.com> <545A208A.7040304@meetinghouse.net> <631e3e3d29c843bd9c23151c63612989@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105154903.GI30379@mx1.yitter.info> <498a39b81b774192bd2d609b3feab35f@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105234444.GM31320@crankycanuck.ca> <0d10ba336c984561a1a5d6d81db5f26c@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141106144333.GA33081@mx1.yitter.info> <6e19bf2618a54b27bb1b859842e98144@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
To: Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/_58bYwMoAMHPoyEx0ET1rF0LfAQ
Cc: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 20:55:36 -0000

Milton,

On Nov 6, 2014, at 6:37 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
> It is completely invalid to call a final ICG proposal that was developed by the entire community, is endorsed consensually by all 3 operational communities, has survived one or more public comment periods, and is accepted by the NTIA  - as a kind of extortion, especially when ICANN itself was fully represented in the development of the proposal and had the ability to publicly comment on it. 

I was told ICANN staff on the ICG are forbidden to speak unless in response to a question.  Was I told incorrectly?

Thanks,
-drc
(ICANN CTO, but speaking only for myself. Really.)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email