Re: [Ianaplan] Lawsuit on the IANA stewardship transition

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 01 October 2016 01:10 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B24612B156 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 18:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OI1rGuxDZ-Is for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 18:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1C3B12B13D for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 18:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 64023 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2016 01:10:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 1 Oct 2016 01:10:20 -0000
Date: 1 Oct 2016 01:10:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20161001011000.68423.qmail@ary.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <3270b76a-d19c-2c99-a78e-7861140adad8@gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/_9dwheoMKXTKaPruLtKbA_ESNqs>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Lawsuit on the IANA stewardship transition
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2016 01:10:25 -0000

PS:

>> An Amicus brief has also been filed with the court.  It can be found here:
>> http://www.internetsociety.org/sites/default/files/iana-amicus.pdf
>
>Congratulations to all those who put the NTIA response and the Amicus brief
>together. I am certain that this was not all done during one day.

People involved tell me they stayed up overnight, and it was pulled together
in under 24 hours.

>> The injunction has been denied. The IANA Stewardship transition can proceed on schedule.
>
>Presumably then, the case was not dismissed?

No, the judge only denied the TRO, since the whole thing happened
betwen 1:30 and 4:30 PM.  Once the transition has happened, I suppose
he might dismiss the case as moot.

R's,
John