IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] Time frame inquiry

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 27 May 2015 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973511A03FF for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 13:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oDQrNq31p48s for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 13:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D07851A01D5 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2015 13:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by padbw4 with SMTP id bw4so6110020pad.0 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2015 13:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TspQRdTuerYZGXWs1tPCFTdsj6JRMYxJrDcBo99Mbn8=; b=C4ed1zbI5TAYANBA6LMmwX0AvgxCoBwhgk5krwWDTIEaw+cxqxU2Tnuw8Gk4Jej8Up JFDDWC5JmbPXqqyrcIkXDwtl3Ikvde8Xn6D18K4iuui9b5JpADCiMwmm5A2gpME4MjBG s2wNJMLaKjdqV0Iq7v8wgWkewQ0Lx/iPALlMGca1iM/uSXlgM5cYvvwt0UoPdk3m5FNu ZEZlFL8+5PPWe2Qws0jzykoIqkk+RUh2na54EnfzcSrn0SnCE3mgjwqXARCoMpG6Vswl ZNqBie+HOtfTa/FAtd7UYnd9+jrF5mtfW9ostuv/fjHE74a5DT3RiZoyqiCtDO4YdVAM IE1A==
X-Received: by 10.70.49.198 with SMTP id w6mr60876957pdn.121.1432759064511; Wed, 27 May 2015 13:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:4eff:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:4eff:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v2sm37381pdn.90.2015.05.27.13.37.40 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 May 2015 13:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55662B19.8070902@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 08:37:45 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
References: <D15A3C14-F268-4CF1-B942-BAE57B281C58@cooperw.in> <556D3AAA-1655-4785-9395-8F6CD0B73E44@vigilsec.com> <5F8F0771-C77B-4D90-811B-501A4EC79268@istaff.org> <893FE3E3-A2DD-40D8-B39F-1EB24DFE1806@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <893FE3E3-A2DD-40D8-B39F-1EB24DFE1806@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/a3oQs3ZxRHFEDHHPLT4z3XzGciA>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Time frame inquiry
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 20:37:46 -0000

On 28/05/2015 06:59, Russ Housley wrote:
> John:
> 
>> On May 27, 2015, at 1:33 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>>> ...
>>> However, we also do not believe that we have accomplished a transition until that updated SLA is signed.  We have no way to know when ICANN will get the needed permission.  So, from that perspective, the answer to the question from the ICG leadership is "we do not know”.
>>
>> It would probably be best to provide an answer with sufficient context to allow NTIA 
>> (as the eventual receipt of the information) with the ability to interpolate based on its
>> own knowledge.   For example -
>>
>> “In order to be ready for the stewardship transition, the IETF requires an updated SLA
>> with ICANN which addresses these two issues.  An updated SLA has been drafted and
>> the protocol parameter community can be ready for stewardship transition immediately
>> after its has been executed with ICANN.   At this time, we do not have any information
>> regarding when ICANN will be able to enter into the updated SLA.”
> 
> I was trying to start the conversation on this list ...
> 
> I agree with your proposed formulation.  

Yes, I think that is succinct and to the point. It's ironic that we're being
asked this question when our basic position is that we're happy with
the existing service, but there we go.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email