Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 09 February 2015 19:55 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFC01A1EF2 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:55:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8aYoN06l5I16 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:55:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com (mail-pd0-f175.google.com [209.85.192.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A79921A1BDC for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:55:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pdbfl12 with SMTP id fl12so8669126pdb.2 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:55:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4HzkXgyyOjGVIu46hHM2AYaKHD0wXsO0808kpOWaEAY=; b=fRhzMavPsJboIsX5w0hLUBjz2R4twFI8qamk7KjZ0/U9TioIhJkO7J64J15CmDuv2D B3Hvmzjq+JyYrQgkQ1vVE1u7BZnoMF/XR1/i1gab4TrDucBW4ph2lxrA+A16eAS+2oAQ UDLkCdXGVoat8M/3sAlZyxCF3yptZobkKBCtFCcphEep58TYtAuS7k8tFD9NLaqixrdt gfutJcB9PXG4IEmV6CCwCGtWZe2Z3kSMIfDOVw/J3MfVket5zm1oPeSS2zby1FLTkSKt 5gI4oOCbOVF8PLfYNB60UC4f1xY5gbUHgFbJlVYMURHeLeilfyEycmw1+bA/WKj8wtDL a37Q==
X-Received: by 10.68.242.229 with SMTP id wt5mr14817308pbc.25.1423511738373; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:55:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:4f88:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:4f88:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kv3sm8116522pab.30.2015.02.09.11.55.35 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54D910B7.7080508@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:55:35 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
References: <F22D7C95-49EE-4BB9-9ED9-7475736A46C7@cooperw.in> <01870CB5-34E3-450A-910E-5A18D600B27B@piuha.net> <54D8C55F.9070007@dcrocker.net> <20150209144754.GA5582@mx1.yitter.info> <54D8CC7E.7030100@dcrocker.net> <AC790ADC-C4CC-4D8E-B11A-138FF58D6D8D@standardstrack.com> <CFB653FB-B10A-44E4-9E75-8FCD011F7B7C@isoc.org> <54D8E92C.8020706@dcrocker.net> <03A3C008-E1FD-40D6-B390-41751D782353@isoc.org> <54D8F0A9.4070602@dcrocker.net> <3B29D634-25D1-4702-95CB-80FC34028983@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <3B29D634-25D1-4702-95CB-80FC34028983@isoc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/aW6fkU1TUfMOv9qydN6EEv8phsE>
Cc: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:55:40 -0000

On 10/02/2015 06:41, Ray Pelletier wrote:
> wfm

wfm too. I trust (pun) that the Trust will do some due diligence
to check that it would not be accepting any undesirable liability,
although nothing comes to mind; however, it should be clear that
domain name is distinct intellectual property from the content of
the domain.

A side note: since the beneficiary of the IETF Trust is the IETF,
the IETF's assent is presumably requuired.

   Brian

> 
> ray
> 
>> On Feb 9, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>; wrote:
>>
>> On 2/9/2015 9:23 AM, Ray Pelletier wrote:
>>> I’m not comfortable with that wording.  The IETF Trust is an independent body
>>> with its own processes and limits.  Thus “The IETF is willing to have the IETF
>>> Trust hold…”  I find troublesome.
>>>
>>> IMHO the Trust cannot speculate as to what its action will be when there is 
>>> an ask from an appropriate party to hold the mark and domain.
>>
>>
>> Ray,
>>
>> Thanks for the clarification.  Point taken.
>>
>> The corresponding concern has to do with characterizing the ISTCG/IETF
>> side of things usefully.
>>
>>
>> So again, perhaps a conjunction set:
>>
>>    With regards to the IANA trademark and the IANA.ORG domain, both
>> are associated with the IANA Numbering Services and not with a
>> particular IANA Numbering Services Operator.
>>
>>    ThE IETF considers the IETF Trust to be an acceptable candidate for
>> holding the trademark and domain.
>>
>>    The IETF would support a decision by the IETF Trust to hold the
>> IANA mark, and iana.org domain in behalf of the Internet community.
>>
>> d/
>>
>> -- 
>> Dave Crocker
>> Brandenburg InternetWorking
>> bbiw.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>