Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Mon, 16 February 2015 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57AAF1A6FFD for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:00:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ANLr1y_D13A for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:00:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 335441A6EDB for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:00:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.252.137.35] (helo=JcK-HP8200.jck.com) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1YNPxk-000IAh-32; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:00:04 -0500
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 12:59:59 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Message-ID: <525BCC81BDE2E3F3853E4EB4@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <54E22EA3.1080408@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <54E214E9.3020103@thinkingcat.com> <20150216173555.15904.qmail@ary.lan> <CAOW+2dv61TOLKG90gJwkxkyEueHYUuMqz0W62VOBCSvd0kXS-g@mail.gmail.com> <54E22EA3.1080408@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.35
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/ah8gJtvqC5jXAxVv57yzFkAxawI>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:00:20 -0000

I think the question was whether anyone disagreed, but, in the
event that more affirmative comments are wanted or needed, I
agree as well.

   john


--On Monday, February 16, 2015 17:53 +0000 Stephen Farrell
<stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>; wrote:

> 
> Ditto
> S
> 
> On 16/02/15 17:43, Bernard Aboba wrote:
>> And to me as well.
>> 
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:35 AM, John Levine
>> <johnl@taugh.com>; wrote:
>> 
>>>> If there are objections to these points, please let us know
>>>> by 00h00 UTC on February 19, 2015.
>>> 
>>> Looks OK to me.
>>> 
>>> R's,
>>> John
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ianaplan mailing list
>>> Ianaplan@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ianaplan mailing list
>> Ianaplan@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan