Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep context in mind Re: Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal review

[Andrei Robachevsky <[e-mail]>]

Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat) wrote on 25/08/15 18:58:
> Addressing the scope question head on, I could suggest:
> 
> The IETF IANAPLAN WG has reviewed the draft ICG proposal within the
> context of the WG’s charter (<ref>) — specifically, “Should proposals
> made by other communities regarding the transition of other IANA
> functions affect the IETF protocol parameter registries or the IETF, the
> WG may also review and comment on them.”   The IETF IANAPLAN working
> group continues to believe that a transition away from a US Government
> role in IANA management and oversight is appropriate and confirms
> consensus of its participants that the draft proposal is not perceived
> to pose problems for the Protocol Parameters function.    The IETF
> raised two transition points that are mentioned in Paragraph 3062 of the
> proposal.  We would ask that they be referenced in Part 0, Section V of
> the proposal as well.
> 
> 
> 

I think the combined proposal will work for the IETF and support this
statement.

Andrei