IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 04 November 2014 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9171ACEDC for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 12:48:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GRO_B9ulm2fE for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 12:48:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3419E1A7025 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 12:48:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1527; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415134127; x=1416343727; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=oMGeRfU/hfvHmrA6EYJEMo2BFllaBouCtAUrJVEDZuE=; b=OQLY4nSaykEsf4XjSqVLLWZ4bY7VZZ4/sh5lo2uNijUXA07NuvC0KCSJ UZxTfTkhxz5Sy71TQonnyl3ONegEmRRvUOpyahUp/1ChA3jDmHS6sFrQ4 QdWLXK8A4Wn+9EYeUOE8LTjBjBZkif2NTMno42yDJ2NUx+g434h5bfbjg Y=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 486
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,314,1413244800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="235059966"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2014 20:48:45 +0000
Received: from [10.155.235.98] ([10.155.235.98]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA4KmhXF002104; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 20:48:43 GMT
Message-ID: <54593BAA.3090602@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 12:48:42 -0800
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
References: <6ACE138D-0969-4D8F-9A64-3D1FBB96885A@viagenie.ca> <FC8732DC-BB60-45A2-BF30-0B085CA5FEB9@cooperw.in> <5454B8DE.8040308@cs.tcd.ie> <E5F99046-6C9D-4170-B408-9CA9B7CD6476@gmail.com> <D07CEABF.1357FC%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <40696145-F2EA-428B-911D-60AD5988BE43@cisco.com> <545918F8.40200@cisco.com> <00F4BBBF-E679-405C-90B2-BA02A0862679@cisco.com> <54591ADD.7080300@cisco.com> <3CA17028-BE6F-4668-956E-1618FDB55037@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <3CA17028-BE6F-4668-956E-1618FDB55037@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T5LgowtkPDOMTWgdrELLminvLKBtATtjw"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/bi8EOO4rgjHq7qI9CpjBIzXufQw
Cc: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>, Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 20:48:50 -0000

On 11/4/14, 10:41 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:
> Ok, well that sounds like you are saying this draft would be telling
> IAOC that they had to do this and that gets back to my "this is not
> the hill to die on" 

That would be an exaggeration, to say the least.  Our processes don't
really provide for other ways forward, and we should be able to count on
the IAOC will do their job, which they've been doing for quite some
time.  If we do not lay out the issue clearly enough, they also will not
know what we are asking them to do.  That is what the text does.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email