Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 02 September 2014 08:11 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728F41A0173 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 01:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.568
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.568 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0m20eLkYMKwY for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 01:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0131A0117 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 01:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04190BEFC; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:11:19 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mlavsa7WJFhH; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:11:18 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.9] (unknown [86.42.23.36]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0769BEFB; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:11:17 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <54057BA5.3050902@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 09:11:17 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rhill@hill-a.ch, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNEEGGCKAA.rhill@hill-a.ch>
In-Reply-To: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNEEGGCKAA.rhill@hill-a.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/cNMNByBM5WixRtpbrDgU_0cdN7s
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:11:26 -0000


On 02/09/14 08:59, Richard Hill wrote:
> If they are not changed, then, in my view, ICANN will have no choice
> but to consider that it has ultimate authority over the global
> Internet's systems of unique identifiers, which of course includes
> the protocol parameters.

I can't think of a universe in which is that a helpful statement.

The "will have no choice but to consider" phrasing seems very
like trolling.

And the supposed problematic outcome isn't worth bothering with
anyway. As has been stated numerous times, if ICANN every acted
silly with the protocol parameters, they'd end up out of that
business in 6 months and would probably suffer other collateral
damage as a result. So they just won't mess about is my conclusion
regardless of this transition. (And I don't believe there's any
indication they'd want to mess about with the protocol parameters
anyway - they do a fine job with good folks.)

Richard - wouldn't it be better to stick to a more reality
based discussion?

S.