Re: [Ianaplan] What's happening at ICANN?

Seth Johnson <seth.p.johnson@gmail.com> Wed, 14 October 2015 13:07 UTC

Return-Path: <seth.p.johnson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0491A6F38 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:07:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i3Nv6a6B9m3V for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x234.google.com (mail-qg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F12851A6F58 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgez77 with SMTP id z77so41744782qge.1 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=sf/ZWC4eCxFU1W3gpID301/5ywLmhL+0TldZBys3K30=; b=09fjTfSHVlIrUlEny18BSrOi63p45Kbw0VOZvJHJONYCT/LUwFv9ZhaJTJRoInMXE4 iAh8tgjF7HfTFz5ZMmFz2fTKGDu4nZriMjfvZuqYPFhA3SKvypJP70V2G+TJ97GclEhY fMvA4eywczpaCHgpeHGK/sSj+/FYgZSCEOlomGBjvMrmBxCs026RyFv9R6cNB0+ioCa7 2CU+HayjXu9xZjOEvc/dEDk4Aa4G7rIXWFqpk36Ar1B57oNP3+XEyocEjP4fsI0dIJz8 Sbevj0592rTM0RJFRPj07XclyiMvby0EPPjqMrh+qLpK/yzr+7NnM6Wc9ZPow2KxUb/s rFcw==
X-Received: by 10.140.99.49 with SMTP id p46mr3734091qge.76.1444828046154; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.207.72 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20151014120658.55972.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <CAJkfFByEgaUVGR8APfoyNv_y4Qpx9FhPrEy57Bk5j1vgmyBeJg@mail.gmail.com> <20151014120658.55972.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Seth Johnson <seth.p.johnson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:06:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJkfFBw27jss0OhbaY+J+cYfpZs19M33wdU3cqE94-JCFH5=Ew@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/cNpUnzwB1yKfH9TvAPVM_OOfyQw>
Cc: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] What's happening at ICANN?
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:07:35 -0000

There's a lot of things that can be done with protocol parameters and
number allocations to support intergovernmental policy.  And you can
find yourselves having to kowtow to those uses.  :-)

While in the US, we have our channels of recourse and generally the
government doesn't operate that way.  We hardly know it though.  :-)


Seth

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:06 AM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>; wrote:
>>Here's the key to this though: the "more technical" areas have had the
>>ability to operate in that way because they are in a stewardship
>>context where governmental inroads have been proscribed. ...
>
> Huh.  And I always assumed it was because in neither the parameter
> nor the number allocations is there a lot of money at stake.
>
> R's,
> John
>
> PS: On the other hand, I remember X.400 and GOSIP.