Re: [Ianaplan] Time frame inquiry

John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org> Wed, 27 May 2015 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <jcurran@istaff.org>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E46A1ACD89 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 15:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1GI4SJKT2QqQ for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 15:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pmta2.delivery5.ore.mailhop.org (pmta2.delivery5.ore.mailhop.org [54.186.218.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4314F1ACD5D for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2015 15:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.200.106] (unknown [98.252.11.61]) by outbound2.ore.mailhop.org (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 27 May 2015 22:07:56 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
In-Reply-To: <893FE3E3-A2DD-40D8-B39F-1EB24DFE1806@vigilsec.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 18:07:34 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <776CE7C4-50C1-4BC8-9129-A7217604064C@istaff.org>
References: <D15A3C14-F268-4CF1-B942-BAE57B281C58@cooperw.in> <556D3AAA-1655-4785-9395-8F6CD0B73E44@vigilsec.com> <5F8F0771-C77B-4D90-811B-501A4EC79268@istaff.org> <893FE3E3-A2DD-40D8-B39F-1EB24DFE1806@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/d6zjNw64PCaC742BHZ33xl-Xx5I>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Time frame inquiry
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 22:07:43 -0000

On May 27, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> ...   For example -
>> 
>> “In order to be ready for the stewardship transition, the IETF requires an updated SLA
>> with ICANN which addresses these two issues.  An updated SLA has been drafted and
>> the protocol parameter community can be ready for stewardship transition immediately
>> after its has been executed with ICANN.   At this time, we do not have any information
>> regarding when ICANN will be able to enter into the updated SLA.”
> 
> I was trying to start the conversation on this list …

Indeed - excellent idea.

> I agree with your proposed formulation.  

I am 100% certain that other folks (e.g. Eliot) can do a better job
with this - my text was just to be an _example_ (to support the idea
that we need to supply enough context in the response) rather than
any form of thoughtful work product…

:-)
/John

Disclaimer: my views alone