IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] IANA transition and US government budget

Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> Mon, 23 May 2016 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC5812DBDD for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2016 14:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, FSL_HELO_HOME=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k5naLcecbs6p for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2016 14:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net (server1.neighborhoods.net [207.154.13.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEA312DBE5 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 14:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439E64BC01E for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 17:27:39 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.6.2 (20081215) (Debian) at neighborhoods.net
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server1.neighborhoods.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qbvXngG23p3v for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 17:27:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from Miless-MBP.fios-router.home (pool-108-26-191-201.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [108.26.191.201]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BCC6CC439 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 17:27:36 -0400 (EDT)
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
References: <005c01d1b4c2$2aa53420$7fef9c60$@ch> <2a26beaa-5a39-0d4e-bade-4d672defbb04@gmail.com>
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
Message-ID: <67c2ffc5-c815-4ef2-77b8-01d97ca8540d@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 17:27:35 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2a26beaa-5a39-0d4e-bade-4d672defbb04@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------9D7BFA66591B156F83F7CFDD"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/dnjd_A12AVArsbYacGVoTJE-6F4>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] IANA transition and US government budget
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 21:27:42 -0000

On 5/23/16 4:46 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 23/05/2016 19:10, Richard Hill wrote:
>> According to a blog post that I saw, the US Congress has again stated in the
>> approved budget for the Federal Government that NTIA cannot spend any money
>> on the IANA transition, and this until August 2017.
>>
>> 1) Does anybody on this list know if the above is correct?
>>
>> 2) Does anybody on this list know whether that would prevent the transition
>> from taking place in 2016?
> Even if it happened, I don't see why the transition needs even one penny
> of USG money. If so, what am I missing?
>
>      Brian

NTIA has to review and approve the transition, otherwise IANA continues 
to operate under contract to the USG or things go into a really strange 
limbo.

Miles Fidelman




-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.  .... Yogi Berra

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email