IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] What's happening at ICANN?

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 14 October 2015 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E9E1A21A3 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.663
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.663 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZDvnRuLQ0OjR for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A10C01A219F for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 46787 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2015 13:01:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 14 Oct 2015 13:01:37 -0000
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:06:58 -0000
Message-ID: <20151014120658.55972.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAJkfFByEgaUVGR8APfoyNv_y4Qpx9FhPrEy57Bk5j1vgmyBeJg@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/e_Ty-o3t85Dk-3hsF3r4XcTThS0>
Cc: seth.p.johnson@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] What's happening at ICANN?
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:01:38 -0000

>Here's the key to this though: the "more technical" areas have had the
>ability to operate in that way because they are in a stewardship
>context where governmental inroads have been proscribed. ...

Huh.  And I always assumed it was because in neither the parameter
nor the number allocations is there a lot of money at stake.

R's,
John

PS: On the other hand, I remember X.400 and GOSIP.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email