Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 16 February 2015 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A661A7001 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:54:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8r5YE0fN3wv2 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:54:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 011BD1A1BBC for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:53:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC66BECC; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:53:42 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M36GhgmTHE8a; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:53:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [172.16.20.132] (unknown [216.127.117.38]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74B87BEF1; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:53:40 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <54E22EA3.1080408@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:53:39 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <54E214E9.3020103@thinkingcat.com> <20150216173555.15904.qmail@ary.lan> <CAOW+2dv61TOLKG90gJwkxkyEueHYUuMqz0W62VOBCSvd0kXS-g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOW+2dv61TOLKG90gJwkxkyEueHYUuMqz0W62VOBCSvd0kXS-g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/eisC-FU_Km3KALO9DyH7SEgY6vo>
Cc: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:54:06 -0000

Ditto
S

On 16/02/15 17:43, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> And to me as well.
> 
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:35 AM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>; wrote:
> 
>>> If there are objections to these points, please let us know by 00h00 UTC
>>> on February 19, 2015.
>>
>> Looks OK to me.
>>
>> R's,
>> John
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ianaplan mailing list
>> Ianaplan@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>