Re: [Ianaplan] CWG proposal up for public comment

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Fri, 24 April 2015 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123C11B36FC for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 07:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0LzBe1LjJI9o for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 07:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mx2.yitter.info [IPv6:2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fedf:cfab]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE8B1B36F8 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 07:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C30D10688 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:08:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx2.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZoiZi14Bz6Ve for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:08:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (unknown [IPv6:2601:6:8c80:55dd:4cda:50f6:7d3c:d9c9]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 607AB10636 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:08:32 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:08:31 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150424140831.GF709@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <20150423133805.GB17594@mx2.yitter.info> <20150424135245.58AED106B0@mx2.yitter.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150424135245.58AED106B0@mx2.yitter.info>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/hfqtg8LT9JvvZwH9KzJY2exdaGQ>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] CWG proposal up for public comment
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:08:36 -0000

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:52:38PM +0200, Jefsey wrote:
> Interesting how there is no mention of the OIO relations. (Other IANA
> Operators).

I'm not sure what you mean, but if you mean other registries for
protocol parameters I'd expect that to be out of scope for the names
community.

What other IANA operators are there for the names community?

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com