Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 28 September 2015 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4291A8AC1 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 18:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.663
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.663 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PC7pfDtUOLGv for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 18:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AB031A8F4E for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 18:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 27989 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2015 01:56:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 28 Sep 2015 01:56:07 -0000
Date: 28 Sep 2015 01:55:44 -0000
Message-ID: <20150928015544.6724.qmail@ary.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <3A58359B-420B-4FEC-B812-4659D980C5D3@vigilsec.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/iAfIsGwqDRnejnOlyKkLCVrehK8>
Cc: housley@vigilsec.com
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 01:56:10 -0000

>I think that we should respond with a very simple confirmation that we plan to continue to coordinate with the other
>operational communities, but that we do not think that formal processes are necessary to do so.

I completely agree.  It is not a good use of anyone's time to invent
complex processes for hypothetical situations.  Particularly since if
the problem actually comes to pass, it will certainly do so in a way
different from what the invented processes anticipate.

R's,
John