Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG

Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org> Mon, 09 February 2015 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rpelletier@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4341A1B47 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 09:00:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F-H6-DPxnjCq for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 09:00:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0079.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3F4C1A1B4A for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 09:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.13] (72.237.59.193) by BLUPR06MB228.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.191.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.81.19; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 17:00:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <AC790ADC-C4CC-4D8E-B11A-138FF58D6D8D@standardstrack.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 12:01:28 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <CFB653FB-B10A-44E4-9E75-8FCD011F7B7C@isoc.org>
References: <F22D7C95-49EE-4BB9-9ED9-7475736A46C7@cooperw.in> <01870CB5-34E3-450A-910E-5A18D600B27B@piuha.net> <54D8C55F.9070007@dcrocker.net> <20150209144754.GA5582@mx1.yitter.info> <54D8CC7E.7030100@dcrocker.net> <AC790ADC-C4CC-4D8E-B11A-138FF58D6D8D@standardstrack.com>
To: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
X-Originating-IP: [72.237.59.193]
X-ClientProxiedBy: BY1PR0201CA0006.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.160.191.144) To BLUPR06MB228.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.191.152)
Authentication-Results: standardstrack.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR06MB228;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004); SRVR:BLUPR06MB228;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 04825EA361
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6049001)(6009001)(24454002)(377454003)(46102003)(57306001)(33656002)(42186005)(40100003)(122386002)(82746002)(92566002)(19580405001)(19580395003)(50466002)(47776003)(87976001)(83716003)(93886004)(117156001)(66066001)(23676002)(76176999)(50986999)(110136001)(50226001)(86362001)(36756003)(2950100001)(15975445007)(77096005)(77156002)(62966003)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR06MB228; H:[192.168.0.13]; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR06MB228;
X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Feb 2015 17:00:04.6851 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR06MB228
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/kQU1uhgyEY_qrqoTfARroqcFVvs>
Cc: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:00:09 -0000

> On Feb 9, 2015, at 11:41 AM, Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>; wrote:
> 
> I like this language. It captures our willingness to have the IETF Trust hold the registration while also capturing our disinterest in fighting for it.

Can’t we agree on these two bits:

With regards to the IANA trademark and the IANA.ORG domain, both are associated with the IANA Numbering Services and not with a particular IANA Numbering Services Operator. 

The IETF Trust would be an acceptable candidate for holding the trademark and domain.

Ray
no hats

> 
>> On Feb 9, 2015, at 10:04 AM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>; wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> In terms of making a discrete statement, perhaps this translates to:
>> 
>>    The IETF is willing to have the IETF Trust hold registration of
>> IANA.ORG, if that is the preference produced from the IANA Stewardship
>> Transition Coordination Group process.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan