Re: [Ianaplan] What's happening at ICANN?

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sat, 10 October 2015 03:42 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3006F1B54F3 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 20:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kCpf_fCHUXNa for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 20:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AE6E1B54F0 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 20:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.87] (76-218-10-206.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.10.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t9A3gcCR027262 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 9 Oct 2015 20:42:39 -0700
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <56181181.50002@gmail.com> <A7820A94-B698-4AAF-B8C7-8EC03E3763E3@gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <5618892B.2090000@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 20:42:35 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A7820A94-B698-4AAF-B8C7-8EC03E3763E3@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Fri, 09 Oct 2015 20:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/lC_NPMKcEWESLidyOstzLQcdoZA>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] What's happening at ICANN?
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 03:42:41 -0000

On 10/9/2015 8:08 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> Press stories tend to be alarming, because that generates more clicks than say, a boring headline such as "CCWG recommendations questioned by many".


The Register does not always sensationalize stories.

Just most of the time.

The IETF is participating in a multi-pronged effort.  If each
organization that is part of this is comfortable with what is happening,
that's probably more important than what is in one or another newspaper
article.  Same if one of the participating organizations is UNcomfortable.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net