IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)

"Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> Sat, 08 November 2014 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72071A6F33 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 08:42:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.267
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.267 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ktMROaZUKWBI for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 08:42:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com (mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F26E1A6F58 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 08:42:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049376.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049376.ppops.net-0018ba01. (8.14.7/8.14.7) with SMTP id sA8GgaD1026997; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 11:42:36 -0500
Received: from stntexhc11.cis.neustar.com ([156.154.17.216]) by m0049376.ppops.net-0018ba01. with ESMTP id 1qh221hqjg-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 08 Nov 2014 11:42:36 -0500
Received: from STNTEXMB10.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.5.97]) by stntexhc11.cis.neustar.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 11:42:26 -0500
From: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
Thread-Index: AQHP960iQbkZx6Ao80Cv4+wEz5Ij95xPyGuAgAA0/ACAAADXAIAAAw4AgACLogCAACs6gP//uiCAgADC1gCAAAfPgIAACgwAgAAESoD//32igIAAiAgAgAAA6YCAAAWHAIAAKOGAgAASLoCAAErKAIAAeYgAgAAktgCAAAkQAIAAaaqAgAAbPACAAAd4AIAAZEGA//+U/oAAVsNggP//ld8AgAHiDQCAAAQkgP//iACA
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 16:42:26 +0000
Message-ID: <D083864D.138D18%jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
References: <631e3e3d29c843bd9c23151c63612989@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105154903.GI30379@mx1.yitter.info> <498a39b81b774192bd2d609b3feab35f@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105234444.GM31320@crankycanuck.ca> <545ABCB0.5080206@meetinghouse.net> <8f3dcda6c3db4cd8be1b77444f987d59@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <D0805C27.136BE7%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <059f2b06a7b44f09b7568d8966861fb8@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <D0824FAD.137A42%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <E314302D-5179-4899-9DB7-A3AF18C134E8@gmail.com> <20141108155153.GB37292@mx1.yitter.info>
In-Reply-To: <20141108155153.GB37292@mx1.yitter.info>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.4.140807
x-originating-ip: [192.168.128.84]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <A48E7D02F64AB84A8A55AEDA827E05B9@neustar.biz>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5600 definitions=7615 signatures=670576
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1411080155
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/laZFzuxyFic1NcKvyx5vK6R7EIE
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 16:42:52 -0000

Sure, but the steps we take today to safeguard ourselves from possible
contingencies could be unilateral demands that alienate our peers or they
could approach this in the spirit of past cooperation. I'm worried that if
we strike the wrong posture, we could end up inspiring the very split
we're hoping to guard against. So I think it's fair to say that I'd want
our current ICG response process to think cooperatively, rather than
antagonisticly, say.

Jon Peterson
Neustar, Inc.

On 11/8/14, 7:51 AM, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

>On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 07:37:04AM -0800, Bernard Aboba wrote:
>> 
>> [BA] Since "IANA .org" affects all the communities, this needs to be
>>handled cooperatively.
>
>Wait, no.  I deny this premise for the purposes of this discussion.
>
>We _already_ have in the draft a term that says "iana.org goes with
>the operator."  This is, AIUI, a request for a term that is already in
>effect.
>
>What we are talking about is a case where different registries go
>their separate ways, and they do so un-co-operatively.  In that case,
>_by definition_, iana.org won't affect all communities (or anyway,
>can't affect them all in the same way).
>
>By definition, it can't be handled co-operatively in this case,
>because we're already into non-co-operation as part of the scenario
>we're trying to cope with.
>
>Best regards,
>
>A
>
>-- 
>Andrew Sullivan
>ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ianaplan mailing list
>Ianaplan@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email