IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)

"Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> Fri, 07 November 2014 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3056A1A1B61 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 14:39:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.267
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.267 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aSwPxpdTCMPF for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 14:39:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B297A1A1B3B for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 14:39:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049367.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049367.ppops.net-0018ba01. (8.14.7/8.14.7) with SMTP id sA7MZDA0031274; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:39:33 -0500
Received: from stntexhc12.cis.neustar.com ([156.154.17.216]) by m0049367.ppops.net-0018ba01. with ESMTP id 1qh2sm8exv-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 07 Nov 2014 17:39:33 -0500
Received: from STNTEXMB10.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.5.97]) by stntexhc12.cis.neustar.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:39:33 -0500
From: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
To: Eric Burger <eburger-l@standardstrack.com>, "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
Thread-Index: AQHP960iQbkZx6Ao80Cv4+wEz5Ij95xPyGuAgAA0/ACAAADXAIAAAw4AgACLogCAACs6gP//uiCAgADC1gCAAAfPgIAACgwAgAAESoD//32igIAAiAgAgAAA6YCAAAWHAIAAKOGAgAASLoCAAErKAIAAeYgAgAAktgCAAAkQAIAAaaqAgAAbPACAAAd4AIAAZEGA//+U/oAAVsNggP//ld8AgACgnQD//5QagIAAjMiA//9+JAA=
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 22:39:32 +0000
Message-ID: <D08287B0.137E82%jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
References: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNIEOJCNAA.rhill@hill-a.ch> <54594A50.4090305@meetinghouse.net> <20141105001731.GA30186@mx1.yitter.info> <54597BDB.7040305@meetinghouse.net> <5459BA98.1070006@gmail.com> <545A208A.7040304@meetinghouse.net> <631e3e3d29c843bd9c23151c63612989@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105154903.GI30379@mx1.yitter.info> <498a39b81b774192bd2d609b3feab35f@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105234444.GM31320@crankycanuck.ca> <545ABCB0.5080206@meetinghouse.net> <8f3dcda6c3db4cd8be1b77444f987d59@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <D0805C27.136BE7%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <059f2b06a7b44f09b7568d8966861fb8@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <D0824FAD.137A42%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <bcb86b6995de41feba256567c114265d@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <D0826BB8.137BBD%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <C11129E1-D9FF-4DD1-9E17-CE379851D19F@standardstrack.com>
In-Reply-To: <C11129E1-D9FF-4DD1-9E17-CE379851D19F@standardstrack.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.4.140807
x-originating-ip: [192.168.128.84]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <C6D5E0EA9D133548AE5DBD0D626480E3@neustar.biz>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5600 definitions=7615 signatures=670576
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1411070190
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/lsVGTy8ndP71fVoPKVW-luPkD7Y
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 22:39:37 -0000

On 11/7/14, 2:24 PM, "Eric Burger" <eburger-l@standardstrack.com> wrote:

>Here is the rub. This whole discussion is about policy and law. Saying
>all we need is an engineering solution is missing the point. If that was
>the case, we can all go home now.

There is a whole discussion and then there's this particular rathole of a
rathole. Our deliverable is a working group consensus document in response
to the ICG: mostly that's a tutorial about how the IETF uses the IANA
function, which is partly about policy, not much about law, and partly
about engineering. In a very small part of that response, some text
reflects our attitude towards unfortunate contingencies, which I suggested
we could address with either politics or engineering, or various
admixtures of the two. I'm not aware I'm missing any point here...

>Eery to be in agreement with Milton and not Jon. Weird.

... but going home works for me.

Jon Peterson
Neustar, Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email