IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)

"Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> Thu, 06 November 2014 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625F11A8832 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 08:00:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.267
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.267 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YyxEYoljturS for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 08:00:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A90471A8834 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 08:00:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049367.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049367.ppops.net-0018ba01. (8.14.7/8.14.7) with SMTP id sA6FuWwg032151; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 10:56:39 -0500
Received: from stntexhc11.cis.neustar.com ([156.154.17.216]) by m0049367.ppops.net-0018ba01. with ESMTP id 1qfuc5ha5f-6 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 06 Nov 2014 10:56:38 -0500
Received: from STNTEXMB10.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.5.97]) by stntexhc11.cis.neustar.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 10:54:31 -0500
From: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
To: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
Thread-Index: AQHP960iQbkZx6Ao80Cv4+wEz5Ij95xPyGuAgAA0/ACAAADXAIAAAw4AgACLogCAACs6gP//uiCAgADC1gCAAAfPgIAACgwAgAAESoD//32igIAAiAgAgAAA6YCAAAWHAIAAKOGAgAASLoCAAErKAIAAeYgAgAAktgCAAAkQAIAAaaqAgAAbPACAAAd4AIAAZEGA//+U/oAAEwHTgP//8BCA
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 15:54:31 +0000
Message-ID: <D080D78C.136C6E%jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
References: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNIEOJCNAA.rhill@hill-a.ch> <54594A50.4090305@meetinghouse.net> <20141105001731.GA30186@mx1.yitter.info> <54597BDB.7040305@meetinghouse.net> <5459BA98.1070006@gmail.com> <545A208A.7040304@meetinghouse.net> <631e3e3d29c843bd9c23151c63612989@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105154903.GI30379@mx1.yitter.info> <498a39b81b774192bd2d609b3feab35f@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105234444.GM31320@crankycanuck.ca> <545ABCB0.5080206@meetinghouse.net> <8f3dcda6c3db4cd8be1b77444f987d59@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <D0805C27.136BE7%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <7F52A930-DD6F-4D0D-8278-A021CF8A466C@istaff.org>
In-Reply-To: <7F52A930-DD6F-4D0D-8278-A021CF8A466C@istaff.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.4.140807
x-originating-ip: [192.168.129.162]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <A477655EC7DCE641AE8A15819AA2B701@neustar.biz>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5600 definitions=7613 signatures=670573
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1411060124
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/moD6oWMuYDO_MUTFFEkT-42yFpQ
Cc: Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>, "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 16:00:35 -0000

>
>Jon - 
> 
>   I have no view on whether the IETF should assert any position with
>   respect to intended future use of the IANA marks or domain name (and
>   do understand how asserting a position, absent constructive
>engagement, 
>   could be misunderstood by others in the stewardship transition planning
>   process.)
>
>   However, I cannot tell if you are also against any mention of the
>IETF's
>   _present and existing use_ of the IANA marks and domain name in the
>ICG 
>   RFP response...  could you opine specifically on this question?

I'm totally fine with detailing the IETF's present and existing use of the
IANA - we would be kind of missing the point of the questionnaire if we
didn't. And I think it would be great if that relationship continued along
past lines. I am only pushing back against the notion that this IETF
response to the ICG should take some ideological or "moral" stance about
the ownership of domains or trademarks. I believe the justifications
offered in support of this move both misunderstand and endanger the role
of the IETF.

Jon Peterson
Neustar, Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email