Re: [Ianaplan] draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call

[Eliot Lear <[e-mail]>]

Hi Andrei,

On 10/29/14, 6:13 PM, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>    >>> What registries are involved in providing the service or
>>    >>> activity.
>>    >>>
>>
>>
>>    IETF Response:
>>
>>    The protocol parameters registries are the product of IETF work.
>>    Administration of the protocol parameters registries is the service
>>    that is provided to the IETF.
> I think that the "protocol parameters registries" are not (well) defined
> in this context. A reader will most probably associate this with
> www.iana.org/protocols, which is a subset.
>
> Since we seemed to agree that the IETF is responsible for all number
> space with the exception of the space delegated to the Internet Number
> Registry System, I think mentioning this in the overlap section only is
> not enough.
>
> Perhaps we can say:
>
> IETF Response:
>
> The protocol parameters registries are the product of IETF work. These
> also include the top-level registry for the entire IP address space and
> some of its sub-registries, AS number space, and a number of special use
> registries with regard to domain names. For more detail please refer to
> the documentation in the "overlaps or interdependencies" section.
>
> Administration of the protocol parameters registries is the service that
> is provided to the IETF.
>

I have no objection to this proposed change.

Eliot