Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process

"Richard Hill" <rhill@hill-a.ch> Mon, 26 January 2015 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <rhill@hill-a.ch>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545FC1A0389 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:25:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WP03lTviqLsB for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:25:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp3.infomaniak.ch (smtp3.infomaniak.ch [IPv6:2001:1600:2:5:92b1:1cff:fe01:147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1208C1A902A for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:25:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Laurie (adsl-178-38-160-202.adslplus.ch [178.38.160.202]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp3.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0QJP0ZF029414; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:25:01 +0100
From: "Richard Hill" <rhill@hill-a.ch>
To: "Russ Housley" <housley@vigilsec.com>, "Miles Fidelman" <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:24:57 +0100
Message-ID: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNOECNDAAA.rhill@hill-a.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <F1800F1F-0FDD-4A96-85EE-25B7F181F370@vigilsec.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/odVOAW_4NM_OStoYuG5Im0UxH74>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: rhill@hill-a.ch
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:25:08 -0000

Thanks for this, but I must be missing something, because I don't see how
the global multi-stakeholder community (as opposed to the IETF) is involved.

Best,
Richard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ianaplan [mailto:ianaplan-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Russ
> Housley
> Sent: lundi, 26. janvier 2015 18:04
> To: Miles Fidelman
> Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal
> development process
>
>
>
> >> SNIP
> >>
> >>> [BA]  The IAOC has its own processes, which provide for
> community comment.
> >>
> >> Can you point us to those processes?
> >
> > Likewise.  And I'll note that I asked this precise question,
> multiple times, during preparation of the WG response, and got no
> substantive answer in response.
>
> Please see https://iaoc.ietf.org/policy-procedures.html
>
> Russ
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>