Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Tue, 17 February 2015 04:17 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8991E1A8726 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 20:17:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LSXapX406dTP for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 20:17:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scintmta01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEF31A8716 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 20:17:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scmeg01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scmse.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.15]) by scintmta01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8675032E4F7; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:16:28 +0900 (JST)
Received: from itmail2.it.aoyama.ac.jp (unknown [133.2.206.134]) by scmeg01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 2dfe_2772_8d6db5cf_f210_4077_a55c_3296a33e040c; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:16:27 +0900
Received: from [133.2.210.64] (unknown [133.2.210.64]) by itmail2.it.aoyama.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE9CBF4DA; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:16:27 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <54E2C09A.5090406@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:16:26 +0900
From: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net, "Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>, "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
References: <54E214E9.3020103@thinkingcat.com> <54E21EF3.20403@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <54E21EF3.20403@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/pvOMzyr9kEir-SsgGoY9nNGcjSs>
Cc: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 04:17:15 -0000

+1, too.   Regards,   Martin.

On 2015/02/17 01:46, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 2/16/2015 8:03 AM, Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat) wrote:
>>
>> We would like to determine if there is consensus on the following
>> points, as expressed by Dave Crocker (thanks!) on February 9, 2015:
>
>
> +1  (duh)
>
> d/
>