IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ianaplan] on considering consensus

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 25 August 2015 05:25 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D813D1B2A21 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xJDX8H84ZqSK for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE4FA1B2A22 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1683; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1440480317; x=1441689917; h=to:cc:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=n/1D4eJbp353KHXNKcyXBKnRs7djF9pPTEXB4zzwvSs=; b=ZIsiiNWd7pPx2ixG27/4qmGJmaLpdE5EHm6LJgP1ZMuq5NMmkG3yzu00 a6QjmNifOK/B3iV6Tfp1MMKgKSV4AnWcgCAZTVjuAwKrDes1dl2GKIvdh bLKdxWShl3oQZd0UJKpMssIcb8wocF1yKN4Crnmz+zw27AE/VpiE7izvJ E=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AQAwAg+9tV/xbLJq1dh326WwqHcoFpFAEBAQEBAQGBCoQmJ0sKATwWCwILAwIBAgE/DAEMCAEBiCqyIJUfAQEBAQEBBAEBAQEBARyQYYJwgUMBBJU0gkCBXIhWgUqHKSOROSaEADyCfwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,744,1432598400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="611167317"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Aug 2015 05:25:15 +0000
Received: from [10.61.162.49] ([10.61.162.49]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t7P5PE1I021219; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 05:25:14 GMT
To: "Leslie Daigle (TCE)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>, Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <55DBFC39.5000701@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 07:25:13 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GC20u76lFJxm4UxqFjK0dGRPS3PUxcowC"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/pyZHU5N1trOGxadIdjLx3e13pvQ>
Cc: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: [Ianaplan] on considering consensus
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 05:25:19 -0000

Hi Leslie & Marc,

I realize I'm being a bit of a pain on this one and I am sorry this
weights on you two, but...  I have two concerns about the text that you
put out as a proposed edit:

1.  The first is that apart from saying that some haven't read the
proposal, Richard hasn't actually raised a substantial objection that we
can discuss.  Richard also raised a process issue that I believe Andrew
dispensed with.

2.  While we do confirm consensus in mailing lists, I would just ask
that you not forget the 15 or so people who took the time to participate
in the interim meeting and worked to come to unanimous agreement on the
previous text.

As such, I would ask that we revert to the text agreed to by the interim.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email