IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Mon, 10 November 2014 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662961A01F6 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:04:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rtwJGpbCmiFx for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:04:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com (mail-pa0-f43.google.com [209.85.220.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 836B21A01E1 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:04:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id eu11so8632498pac.30 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:04:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=VeksRXhXlQHVxgE0wqwIc+FoFnLYXS8Qs2y/fTTymJA=; b=Y+qkFWzgbCDE/vc25qqxn0gTRis23kfpqFCzZqXFm7SWVhjktTPztMk/sDZWQpAkJu yHELosa6z0UesHTEq0AHxoHC8+gFWQKavn0LgbLkmEbS/WJ+xYwcTAmF4nV8QzEwoSXf pFCV2jRoezOY8AnU1oOyMNv/HU0+K1VenzapMBrUDdWXASbK5Ay8RjdxGc54MxeojFQf 1/Od6rHYE+Vzidk0H0pbhX3s/KiXh+gtxrpcII8Brjeh5LMANgKPGNFlv9STqNiZSt/7 tzKk6Mf/1w0GhenexqqvjnFZISckl3hQpcUSAE1tXzvA0XQajNn7nYv38uYjpqSjfWET gQnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmAMLcEJOv20u2RWKwGz5cygItrDCBKrGSpR+hL2UJ49SlYEGbvwg7N6if/lxh91spDHt4R
X-Received: by 10.70.129.104 with SMTP id nv8mr8243675pdb.81.1415639074162; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:04:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.3] (cpe-98-155-151-17.hawaii.res.rr.com. [98.155.151.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z15sm17117430pdi.6.2014.11.10.09.04.32 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:04:33 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4497F987-4AD7-4DC8-8963-6EDE4B4E08B9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <967bd4c3d170439f92555000d7b18331@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 07:04:30 -1000
Message-Id: <39F01C01-5462-4830-A73C-7CAB50E798B7@virtualized.org>
References: <631e3e3d29c843bd9c23151c63612989@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105234444.GM31320@crankycanuck.ca> <545ABCB0.5080206@meetinghouse.net> <8f3dcda6c3db4cd8be1b77444f987d59@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <D0805C27.136BE7%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <059f2b06a7b44f09b7568d8966861fb8@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <D0824FAD.137A42%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <E314302D-5179-4899-9DB7-A3AF18C134E8@gmail.com> <20141108155153.GB37292@mx1.yitter.info> <D083864D.138D18%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <A6D94EF5-BD92-4080-8C18-E415B D0BB880@isi.edu> <C78A1523-316F-46A1-9FCE-D0D205679C84@gmail.com> <13B26DE5-315D-453F-B89B-377CCD338ED9@isi.edu> <A7BD5ECF-11E4-42F1-A2B7-BF9B399635C3@gmail.com> <14D42443-53E7-49FA-88DD-7F4BB6BC2DF4@istaff.org> <545F69FB.5000501@meetinghouse.net> <7B719509-5A93-4B85-B7E2-262DDCB64461@istaff.org> <D0850842.138E23%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <85D607E0-4D3A-499E-87D1-036E0349D80E@gmail.co m> <CBBA1B51-145B-407D-A7E0-0E8CA7F7EFAF@istaff.org> <54606A9C.6040700@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <967bd4c3d170439f92555000d7b18331@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
To: Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/q5eKo4Zz-hgFOGHH7Xbps-Mnd4g
Cc: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:04:40 -0000

On Nov 10, 2014, at 5:08 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
>> A good portion of the complexity here is we are talking about a
>> domain name and trademark that is relevant to multiple communities.
> 
> That sounded reasonable at first, but when I think about the names community, or at least the ongoing process of RZF management and modifications, I see little reason why they would care about the IANA domain or trademark per se. 

A quick scan shows:

whois.iana.org
rzm.iana.org
http://www.iana.org/domains
http://www.iana.org/dnssec
http://data.iana.org/root-anchors/
http://data.iana.org/ksk-ceremony/

> I could see why the numbers community cares about the .arpa domain, but not so much the IANA domain. 

According to the terms of RFC 3172, .ARPA is managed jointly by the IAB and ICANN:

                     "The Internet Architecture Board (IAB) has the
   responsibility, in cooperation with the Internet Corporation for
   Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), to manage the "arpa" domain."

Regards,
-drc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email