Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question from the ICG
Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 19 February 2015 17:54 UTC
Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264201A001C for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:54:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D6v7F0DXN47O for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:54:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC9191A039C for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:54:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.20.140] ([216.127.117.38]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t1JHs7t5021163 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:54:10 -0800
Message-ID: <54E61E27.3060504@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:32:23 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>, "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
References: <54E214E9.3020103@thinkingcat.com> <54E60949.6050706@thinkingcat.com>
In-Reply-To: <54E60949.6050706@thinkingcat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:54:11 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/rVlZYweAfsRIHzMI5FEACITwV8M>
Cc: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:54:13 -0000
On 2/19/2015 8:03 AM, Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat) wrote: > > I have heard some concerns from Jefsey about the scope of "IETF Trust" > versus the Internet community, and one person observed, out of band, > that the last bullet reads properly if it says "on behalf" instead of > "in behalf". (I'd wondered about on vs. in, too.) The question of scope for the representation being provided is fair and important. From the context of the ICG consideration -- as opposed to the context of our IETF discussion here -- it seems clear that this topic really does concern the "Internet" community and not just the "IETF" community. So, indeed, any role of the IETF Trust with these names is on behalf of the (general) Internet community. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Dave Crocker
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Jefsey
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Brian Trammell
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG John Levine
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG John C Klensin
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Jefsey
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Jari Arkko
- [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question from… Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question … Dave Crocker
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question … Jefsey
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question … Jefsey
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question … John Curran