Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] IPR Memo
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 05 August 2015 18:56 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B50B1A8BB4 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:56:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.663
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.663 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0cfsN1F5VFDg for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 288401A8BB3 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 21106 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2015 18:56:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 5 Aug 2015 18:56:49 -0000
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 18:56:09 -0000
Message-ID: <20150805185609.10615.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAD_dc6ihwdafnErepOv4Dvs=ZK11a4nubGGk6yPtYvxqYk3JPA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/rq4cLTP_IQcWmwr9lsRlNzeA50U>
Cc: seun.ojedeji@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] IPR Memo
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 18:56:34 -0000
>Even though this community has submitted her proposal, I thought this CWG >legal document on IANA trademark/domain could be of interest as the 3 >communities tries to determine way forward on this subject matter. I have to say this document appears to have started with the conclusion that ICANN should keep the IANA IPR (domain, trademark, etc.) and worked backwards to find justifications. Much of what it says appears to my semi-lawyerly eye to be just wrong. But I wouldn't suggest making a stink about it, since at this point it's far from clear who's really going to be pushing for what outcomes. R's, John
- [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com… Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client… John Levine
- Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client… Stephen Farrell