IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep context in mind Re: Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal review

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 24 August 2015 20:19 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD301B29A6 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tileNkjyr6KZ for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C6751AD35C for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9A2BF0A; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:19:30 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xs4MNlGkzd7r; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:19:29 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.73] (unknown [86.46.21.200]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10FC3BEFA; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:19:29 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1440447569; bh=3uo7/GR7w3ZCoVdhphv63rbLWQnqyqSRIU3IqL+/8jw=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AVWTC12aAPhZP3amZQu7prrff3+mBesxR8gypaORj1Jwwx4gNo28TX3UWrwPHCwPG eb8bpn0W73oY5ILjQ8wNwnQXBLIEvuC9tR6mjT18P3VSBuPjkpc7yjxee8x5YCWRtw FCNRToFUSWggTRbYS5nxLkNSNbuiMVEXn/FsZKfc=
Message-ID: <55DB7C4C.7070801@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:19:24 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Richard Hill <rhill@hill-a.ch>, "Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>, "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
References: <3A072B1E-FE4C-476E-B6F8-0309F377D221@thinkingcat.com> <55DB487A.2060303@cisco.com> <6f7112a4-4313-4c33-b7d9-a238f01920f8@email.android.com> <55DB4F0E.9000105@cisco.com> <aced0eb7-deed-48e4-85cf-a0ffe55b34aa@email.android.com> <55DB5C8E.20406@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <55DB5C8E.20406@cisco.com>
OpenPGP: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FMR44RNcak9kfVm4AB61psI707drUtRiF"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/rvPX0z98gty_M2WkLp1yzB2kS-Y>
Cc: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep context in mind Re: Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal review
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 20:19:32 -0000


On 24/08/15 19:03, Eliot Lear wrote:
> 
> On 8/24/15 7:18 PM, Richard Hill wrote:
>> > That's not my point. My point is that this group has not considered
>> > the other parts of the proposal, nor should it.
> Andrew has already responded to you on that point.  And some of us
> *have* considered the text on the whole.
> 

I think Eliot is clearly correct here. (Even though I prefer Leslie's
text over Eliot's.)

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email