[Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG

"Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> Mon, 16 February 2015 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84AA71A88D0 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:04:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sK8Dg81nH3FC for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:04:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zoidberg.ecotroph.net (zeke.ecotroph.net []) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BA5E1A88E8 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:03:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aran.int.lexiconix.com (pool-108-44-246-138.clppva.fios.verizon.net []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zoidberg.ecotroph.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0518EA064D; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:03:51 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <54E214E9.3020103@thinkingcat.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:03:53 -0500
From: "Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/sz9apB6Cvp0ZAnlBFVIoyOmMZXA>
Cc: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Subject: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:04:58 -0000


There seems to be general agreement that there is not an incompatibility 
between the RIR proposal requirement and the IETF's proposal.

We would like to determine if there is consensus on the following 
points, as expressed by Dave Crocker (thanks!) on February 9, 2015:

     With regards to the IANA trademark and the IANA.ORG domain, both
are associated with the IANA Numbering Services and not with a
particular IANA Numbering Services Operator.

     The IETF considers the IETF Trust to be an acceptable candidate for
holding the trademark and domain.

     The IETF would support a decision by the IETF Trust to hold the
IANA mark, and iana.org domain in behalf of the Internet community.

If there are objections to these points, please let us know by 00h00 UTC 
on February 19, 2015.



Leslie Daigle
Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises