IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] IANA transition and US government budget

SM <sm@resistor.net> Mon, 23 May 2016 23:09 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F4712D5DF for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2016 16:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=dSehL1Gj; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=resistor.net header.b=QqLmGJH9
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7yiB1Beie4Xg for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2016 16:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE40912D5D3 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 16:09:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4NN9eNi005639 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 23 May 2016 16:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1464044987; x=1464131387; bh=BdQ3ZXEWPOoU9He0hgjQn8KdUZIFo3Zyj6x4MjvSFTM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=dSehL1Gjp8XrDdjFaCQr8w5HrA1l0JJUxDWBbgTuBeXEs1IUQV0CobpsYhUUI25UQ hbl6EMjHaydSxVAfL00Nb3OSDs/OeNVvpwlAWtvbfXyPjxvxFv+wR7JKWdyWe9m0ko Uu1u1TymicGueU8qmkOZPStqPh3fnSbaTHtgZJoo=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1464044987; x=1464131387; i=@resistor.net; bh=BdQ3ZXEWPOoU9He0hgjQn8KdUZIFo3Zyj6x4MjvSFTM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=QqLmGJH9fWey7OwAgywZBRyRdcrdUwT9yiKGIYZOCIvrjiupjKlkBZOMGe4gYdpCn zjNzBVLEknrVrFI0Ccl9OFp2zMfIMtHqTQo+fsLW7mBRXvXx1vAehiHf8VeCIHIC2m 4Kmzmb3SOxaiWiDziUVnmXkwd8VJBAZiji70CoW4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20160523160227.0d3e6080@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 16:09:10 -0700
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, ianaplan@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6a0072fe-1e21-53de-5987-529db82f81fb@gmail.com>
References: <005c01d1b4c2$2aa53420$7fef9c60$@ch> <2a26beaa-5a39-0d4e-bade-4d672defbb04@gmail.com> <67c2ffc5-c815-4ef2-77b8-01d97ca8540d@meetinghouse.net> <6a0072fe-1e21-53de-5987-529db82f81fb@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/tEkq8zmGSm70o0H56YO78KF3bR4>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] IANA transition and US government budget
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 23:09:56 -0000

Hi Brian,
At 15:49 23-05-2016, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>I'm quite sure that a review can be performed without needing a line 
>in the budget.

It is about the how "spending government funds" is interpreted.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email