IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] it's more than that

"Patrik Fältström " <paf@frobbit.se> Mon, 04 May 2015 03:00 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FD31A900B for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 May 2015 20:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.261
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.261 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JFj0W0z05uJV for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 May 2015 20:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E826A1A9008 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 May 2015 20:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.189] (frobbit.cust.teleservice.net [85.30.128.225]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 906DB1FFD8; Mon, 4 May 2015 05:00:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 05:00:40 +0200
Message-ID: <FD35446F-D2F9-4061-8C90-9EF450AE6993@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <20150503214102.33356.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <20150503214102.33356.qmail@ary.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_C829B8DD-F923-4E9E-A3F0-87FEF8A7CF1F_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailer: MailMate Trial (1.9.1r5084)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/uOSarx7cuhp3zMFo6uHlasUAZJY>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org, bernard.aboba@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] it's more than that
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 03:00:44 -0000

On 3 May 2015, at 23:41, John Levine wrote:

> One is that the
> CWG's plan boils down to ICANN overseeing itself through a wholly
> owned subsidiary.

Please note that the CWG Names is not about ICANN oversight. CWG names is about the 3rd operational community (using ICG terminology) due to the fact one of the contracts NTIA has expires.

There are other contracts, for example the AOC that NTIA still have with ICANN that talks about general oversight.

   Patrik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email