Re: [Ianaplan] Update on IANA Transition & Negotiations with ICANN

'Andrew Sullivan' <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Thu, 30 April 2015 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA541B2CAF for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e2K_7g1pz_zB for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mx2.yitter.info [IPv6:2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fedf:cfab]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EDE1B2CB8 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78A51063A for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:30:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx2.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wKTSZgvnosHO for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:30:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (unknown [85.159.94.18]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B48BF10636 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:30:02 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:30:08 +0100
From: 'Andrew Sullivan' <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150430153008.GH65861@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <20150430115751.GE65715@mx2.yitter.info> <00c401d08358$a715f860$f541e920$@ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <00c401d08358$a715f860$f541e920$@ch>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/utpw2gO5iOgd3J6p9XI4TW5YONo>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Update on IANA Transition & Negotiations with ICANN
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:30:11 -0000

Hi,

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 05:16:36PM +0200, Richard Hill wrote:
> Thank you for this. Can you please post the exact language that ICANN has
> difficulty with?

We're waiting for confirmation as to whether the language as it stood
was still covered by the normal "private negotation" rules, so I don't
think I can release the text at the moment.  We're working on that,
however.  This is in keeping with the normal way the IAOC develops
these annual supplemental agreement or any other IAOC agreement.
However, I should note something:

> However, we are discussing arrangements that would hold if there is no
> longer any contract between ICANN and NTIA

That is not what we were discussing.  The IETF and ICANN were
discussing the annual SLA or supplemental agreement.  It would come
into effect at signing, as all the previous ones have, and since ICANN
still has an agreement with NTIA right now, ICANN's current agreements
are (quite correctly) a constraint on what ICANN can do.  I'm sorry if
that wasn't clear in our update.

Best regards,

Andrew (speaking for myself)

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com