Re: [Ianaplan] Adrian Farrel's No Objection on charter-ietf-ianaplan-00-04: (with COMMENT)

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

I'd like to see it published as an RFC at the point in time that the proposal is actually submitted to NTIA.

Russ


On Sep 4, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:

> Adrian Farrel has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-ianaplan-00-04: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-ianaplan/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Notwithstanding that "IETF consensus document" normally means "an RFC on
> which there has been IETF last call and where there is consensus for
> publication" I feel that
>   The IANAPLAN working group is chartered to produce an IETF consensus
>   document
> needs to be clarified since it leave ambiguity as to whether an RFC is
> the intended output. there are three options (pick one!)
> - "...that will be published as an RFC"
> - "...that may be published as an RFC"
> - "...that will be produced as an Internet-Draft and submitted to the
> ICANN thingy committee when consensus has been reached."
> 
> ---
> 
> In view of Joel's comment about timeliness, I wonder whether
> micro-management through the milestones might be helpful.
> 
>