Re: [Ianaplan] Time frame inquiry

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 28 May 2015 04:33 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7231A88C5 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 21:33:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LT8H6OA3arC1 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 21:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B5F01A01AA for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2015 21:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6005; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432787594; x=1433997194; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=nAMrs+8YkYspzuTbtgZcgMDTFfaQSCjAYEr3ja8r1kk=; b=aMcqOz/McsWbOvGnhRGloZOcoyMVcr3IzikrrHinGNsrF+m05GEI7xhG kR45TKqW+4t894cIvBJd5as09VxfiqHq/PWxcdNy1ajzQDsJfoJIg6+3j U+AJNf7kyFX0LmZF3Y70ZhV0VbwluqcyRmIYRpDPChtQKdejjnNQSHuaG g=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CxAwAnmmZV/xbLJq1cg2Regx6+SQmBUAEJhS1KAoF/FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQjAQEEAQEBIEsKARALBBQJFgsCAgkDAgECARUwBgEMAQUCAQEQiBkNrzKkCwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARMEizqFBQeCaIFFAQSLVYlFgUOHOoEphk+HWIdfI4IKHIFUPDGCRwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,510,1427760000"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="495072837"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 May 2015 04:32:56 +0000
Received: from [10.61.80.140] (ams3-vpn-dhcp4237.cisco.com [10.61.80.140]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4S4Wunp020782; Thu, 28 May 2015 04:32:56 GMT
Message-ID: <55669A78.3020309@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 06:32:56 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <D15A3C14-F268-4CF1-B942-BAE57B281C58@cooperw.in> <556D3AAA-1655-4785-9395-8F6CD0B73E44@vigilsec.com> <5F8F0771-C77B-4D90-811B-501A4EC79268@istaff.org> <893FE3E3-A2DD-40D8-B39F-1EB24DFE1806@vigilsec.com> <97267ED7-D8A2-4A64-AB74-07434190DD89@piuha.net> <CA+9kkMBZq_U+CC5Jzv5T3pL7qasUHSfv-Gu8q4P36+phABXxzg@mail.gmail.com> <4AB120DC-AFB1-4915-B6C5-7417FB989878@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <4AB120DC-AFB1-4915-B6C5-7417FB989878@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gIhDnoSasuUuuh3uIC02ot899FnVNWVPB"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/vnh63bqrLLbWAZFUMiwgPuNlu-o>
Cc: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>, John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Time frame inquiry
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 04:33:16 -0000

Jari, Ted,

I like the text below modulo one issue: the IANAPLAN proposal did not
specify how the IAOC would implement the requested changes (whether
through the SLA or another side agreement).  I would prefer that we
stuck to that approach and not name which agreement the changes go into
(SLA or a one-time supplemental agreement).

Eliot

On 5/28/15 1:41 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
>> ​Should we not summarize these issues here?​
> Sure. I was lazy to add the text…
>
>>  
>> The update
>> has been drafted and from our perspective could be
>> immediately executed. When executed — and with
>> the NTIA contract with ICANN is voided -- from our
>> perspective the protocol parameter community
>> has completed the stewardship transition.​
>>
>> Would this also work: "Once these SLAs are in place, the transition would be substantially complete, with only the NTIA contract lapse or termination as a final step. “ ?
> Yes - that would be better. Thanks.
>
>> ​I think we may want to highlight this slightly differently.
>>
>> "In addition, the names community has proposed the creation of a 'Post Transition IANA' (PTI).  If the existing agreements between the IETF and ICANN remain in place and the SLAs discussed above are not affected, the IETF​ transition would take place as described above.  That is our preference.  If the final details of the PTI plan require further action from the IETF, more work and community agreement would be required.  The timeline for that work cannot be set until the scope is known.”
> This is better too.
>
> Jari
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan