Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal review

"Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> Fri, 21 August 2015 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94161ABD35 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, J_CHICKENPOX_64=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d44B66xfM8HS for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a49.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A971A92FB for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a49.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a49.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A02C200D3091; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=thinkingcat.com; h=from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=thinkingcat.com; bh=g GgCX17z5YADj+00mVyBbY4k3bk=; b=r/at+d1Vi7i5YHDD0SO7w1Id/jhyWbKaN 3gQ5h9jyjqrejkq3qPdzQ7Vj7NZmsqNFsCpnnrD7U8vrRsXUiBcCA26eVCww6Xqj Z57jyBfd8K2jRM1IyWXOh/ucY0ZZWzVRdsRVPoUOz8ZWvMq45eJ/iLvgWwhwiF7l 9xqPgK9SfQ=
Received: from [192.168.1.9] (pool-108-44-246-138.clppva.fios.verizon.net [108.44.246.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: leslie@oceanpurl.net) by homiemail-a49.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C221200D3096; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
To: "Richard Hill" <rhill@hill-a.ch>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:09:42 -0400
Message-ID: <BAB634F7-2429-4C09-AAAF-96D47C78EB51@thinkingcat.com>
In-Reply-To: <018901d0dc22$4efb3870$ecf1a950$@ch>
References: <95236452-2600-473E-B326-8AB8242484B4@thinkingcat.com> <018901d0dc22$4efb3870$ecf1a950$@ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
X-Mailer: MailMate Trial (1.9.1r5084)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/w8BTUQewmloY_Lkx1kUHNXBiAgg>
Cc: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>, Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal review
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:09:56 -0000

Hi Richard,

I appreciate that there is much more that can be said about the overall 
proposal, but please see the note I just sent to the list clarifying the 
context for our remarks, and let us (the WG) know your perspective in 
the light of that context.

Thanks,
Leslie.

-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Leslie Daigle
Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------
On 21 Aug 2015, at 11:01, Richard Hill wrote:

> Please note that I do not agree with this. I have many objections to 
> the combined ICG proposal, even if not specifically with the protocols 
> part of that proposal.
>
> So I object to this.
>
> Thanks and best,
> Richard
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ianaplan [mailto:ianaplan-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Leslie
>> Daigle (ThinkingCat)
>> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 16:35
>> To: Ianaplan@Ietf. Org
>> Cc: Marc Blanchet
>> Subject: [Ianaplan] Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal
>> review
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As noted in the minutes from today’s IANAPLAN WG virtual interim
>> meeting, participants agreed on a brief message in support of the
>> collected ICG proposal.
>>
>> While the IAB is preparing a wider response, the proposal is that the
>> IANAPLAN WG will communicate to the ICG the following message related
>> to the IANAPLAN’s work output (part of the IETF contribution):
>>
>> “The IETF IANAPLAN working group supports the draft ICG proposal 
>> going
>> forward.  The IETF raised two transition points that are mentioned in
>> Paragraph 3062 of the proposal.  We would ask that they be referenced
>> in Part 0, Section V of the proposal as well.”
>>
>> This message is to confirm WG consensus on the proposed action via 
>> this
>> e-mail list.  All WG participants are encouraged to review the 
>> meeting
>> minutes for further elaboration of the discussion around this text.  
>> If
>> you have any disagreement with it, please share your comment to this
>> list by noon EDT (16h00 UTC) Friday August 28, 2015.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Leslie, for Leslie&Marc.
>>
>> --
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Leslie Daigle
>> Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
>> ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ianaplan mailing list
>> Ianaplan@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan