[Ianaplan] Please keep context in mind Re: Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal review

"Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> Fri, 21 August 2015 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580B51ABD35 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, J_CHICKENPOX_64=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XKZJBH3qKjv4 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a95.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D9B1AC399 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a95.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a95.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD72D1E064; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=thinkingcat.com; h=from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=thinkingcat.com; bh=4 7aUsBZrolK+8yL/0VfgY/vajdQ=; b=jctJqdS4JYOFHDOMX0nTKNgXND6VaO4Wo 1hK7L2xFYuyK5XQrQT3Dclh0VdYcuwBzmLYjaiDReU4rBXBjTUZwyHrrq/rqdi0w LdX58BhUukynA+k8cD98KCSiKRNBduySz5IXohPbleD2KB9LCe4SCvmhgWbGqJzq 1dfpB9qpdI=
Received: from [192.168.1.9] (pool-108-44-246-138.clppva.fios.verizon.net [108.44.246.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: leslie@oceanpurl.net) by homiemail-a95.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B5391E071; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
To: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:07:40 -0400
Message-ID: <74EDDFB1-9DB7-42FC-9C99-31568251D6D7@thinkingcat.com>
In-Reply-To: <95236452-2600-473E-B326-8AB8242484B4@thinkingcat.com>
References: <95236452-2600-473E-B326-8AB8242484B4@thinkingcat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate Trial (1.9.1r5084)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/wpZ1quvH3SmdJDxOoDEdl5T8oK8>
Cc: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Subject: [Ianaplan] Please keep context in mind Re: Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal review
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:07:59 -0000

Hi,

As noted in the meeting minutes I referred people to, and the meeting 
materials, any WG input must be framed in the context of our Charter, 
specifically:

   Should proposals made by other communities regarding the
   transition of other IANA functions affect the IETF protocol parameter
   registries or the IETF, the WG may also review and comment on them.

Any *other* perspectives you have about support for the ICG proposal may 
be submitted individually to the ICG process.  Indeed, we encourage 
people to do exactly that.

The question before the group is whether the text outlined is 
appropriate and acceptable (only) within the context of what this group 
was chartered to look at.

Thanks,
Leslie.


-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Leslie Daigle
Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------
On 21 Aug 2015, at 10:34, Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat) wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As noted in the minutes from today’s IANAPLAN WG virtual interim 
> meeting, participants agreed on a brief message in support of the 
> collected ICG proposal.
>
> While the IAB is preparing a wider response, the proposal is that the 
> IANAPLAN WG will communicate to the ICG the following message related 
> to the IANAPLAN’s work output (part of the IETF contribution):
>
> “The IETF IANAPLAN working group supports the draft ICG proposal 
> going forward.  The IETF raised two transition points that are 
> mentioned in Paragraph 3062 of the proposal.  We would ask that they 
> be referenced in Part 0, Section V of the proposal as well.”
>
> This message is to confirm WG consensus on the proposed action via 
> this e-mail list.  All WG participants are encouraged to review the 
> meeting minutes for further elaboration of the discussion around this 
> text.  If you have any disagreement with it, please share your comment 
> to this list by noon EDT (16h00 UTC) Friday August 28, 2015.
>
> Thanks,
> Leslie, for Leslie&Marc.
>
> -- 
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Leslie Daigle
> Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
> ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan