Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG
Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> Mon, 09 February 2015 22:19 UTC
Return-Path: <gih@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9613F1A89EB for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 14:19:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u6fYFtBNdUSf for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 14:19:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ia-mailgw.apnic.net (ia-mailgw.apnic.net [IPv6:2001:dd8:a:851::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AFA21A8980 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 14:19:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apnic.net; s=c3po; h=received:received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer:return-path: x-originating-ip; bh=o5T/BEqdcxD/mJic9yyKB7lZbwDDRsej1HLZNQu+eKM=; b=3N3nWfm4GwupZpG+URvQwBhB+i4oX9GUgZNsm13S6MlKjNyOofkdE+GQdDyg1WnLgvprawK0I7FhV F9dc6mxMB4KBq68huAhr1rOd6PHyNv28MqaRNrY2bLoqg5KnDKkSrBEXaf1lEJKMbeH+DqF5t180Nt aYkK8rsEIExCvcMc=
Received: from iamda3.org.apnic.net (unknown [203.119.101.249]) by ia-mailgw.apnic.net (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPS for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:19:51 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from [10.196.222.132] (203.119.101.249) by iamda3.org.apnic.net (203.119.111.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.218.12; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:19:52 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <20150209144754.GA5582@mx1.yitter.info>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 06:19:50 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <DDE1B506-0FE8-444D-AEA3-9A1FD00904EF@apnic.net>
References: <F22D7C95-49EE-4BB9-9ED9-7475736A46C7@cooperw.in> <01870CB5-34E3-450A-910E-5A18D600B27B@piuha.net> <54D8C55F.9070007@dcrocker.net> <20150209144754.GA5582@mx1.yitter.info>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
X-Originating-IP: [203.119.101.249]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/z-Cjw6UQsThW9YvqzOoeTxBBhn0>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:19:59 -0000
> On 9 Feb 2015, at 10:47 pm, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 06:34:07AM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote: >> I took the earlier IANAPlan discussion as deciding that ownership of the >> name was not worth a possibly contentious process, rather than an IETF >> desire not to hold the name. > > That was how I took the earlier discussion too. I will also say that, > in my own case, my opposition to adding iana.org and the IANA trade > mark to our list of transitions must haves was exactly, "Not worth a > possibly contentious process." I think we should not bargain for such > a change, because I don't think it gives us anything that would be > worth giving anything up for. But if someone else wants to engage in > such bargaining, I think the IETF Trust is a fine place for the name > or trademark or both to land. For what its worth, I can live with Andrew's summary. I strongly agree that its a fine place for the trademark to land through the IETF's trust mechanism. I'd like to think that the associated zone contents are sufficient dormant that it carries no further substantive decision process no matter where it lands, but I'm personally not as convinced of that supposition as Andrew appears to be. Geoff
- [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG John Levine
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Jari Arkko
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG John C Klensin
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Dave Crocker
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Jefsey
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Dave Crocker
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Eric Burger
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Dan Schlitt
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Ray Pelletier
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Dave Crocker
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Ray Pelletier
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Dave Crocker
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Ray Pelletier
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Peterson, Jon
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Ray Pelletier
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Peterson, Jon
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG John Curran
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Geoff Huston
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Milton L Mueller
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Milton L Mueller
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Miles Fidelman
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Jefsey
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG John Levine
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Milton L Mueller
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Russ Housley
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG John Levine
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Jefsey
- [Ianaplan] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] Question from the … Alissa Cooper
- [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Russ Housley
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG JFC Morfin
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Jari Arkko
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG John Levine
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Roger Jørgensen
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Russ Housley
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Ted Hardie
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Jari Arkko