IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] What's happening at ICANN?

Seth Johnson <seth.p.johnson@gmail.com> Wed, 14 October 2015 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <seth.p.johnson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDD81A21B1 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id shnbqi68BKfV for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22c.google.com (mail-qg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 483821A21AF for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgez77 with SMTP id z77so41785373qge.1 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=euwBQxXA6PMgFvRz9yb94aj18qiCtrsmDK90pTHLh9U=; b=KDOHMEhq5XP7aBion9mi9pXNdtAe8OyT2y3lKM90yGNkxDHoBDGBjXvUV72jyWbA7b XjTk5ohk2/1tApYSnSVIYzUgrz4zCtS7Xc9E/ppDjOj30oqlNLjIMC8n3DaLCOugbCWJ HH1jAo6Yv3pyiWPTQDeUjyqhUiEdYUV9Ws68qTtpKemB0kwTdk4kq+HX+lNOrfEJ/JIJ zYnt3HXdhclRcqTxJqfGeH4SM24D8VNPRW6EcSte+c4BLs+EjsfiO7EOu9/SLfF6GyD6 O6+CLiu78C7krv6kdN4tF6iwI4aKS/o4Ta3UMuNag4n4X5eCC90wCAER1TAyOjpM7GKP 0DVg==
X-Received: by 10.140.31.130 with SMTP id f2mr3114934qgf.72.1444828133458; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.207.72 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJkfFBw27jss0OhbaY+J+cYfpZs19M33wdU3cqE94-JCFH5=Ew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJkfFByEgaUVGR8APfoyNv_y4Qpx9FhPrEy57Bk5j1vgmyBeJg@mail.gmail.com> <20151014120658.55972.qmail@ary.lan> <CAJkfFBw27jss0OhbaY+J+cYfpZs19M33wdU3cqE94-JCFH5=Ew@mail.gmail.com>
From: Seth Johnson <seth.p.johnson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:08:14 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJkfFBxJPiOa38bSadRvaiQtAyxvuxY-DdoMCR_WdkVJhtmRww@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/z7EXgluF3KZW3GLvqHb5eIEtiS8>
Cc: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] What's happening at ICANN?
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:08:55 -0000

Identifiers in general.

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Seth Johnson <seth.p.johnson@gmail.com> wrote:
> There's a lot of things that can be done with protocol parameters and
> number allocations to support intergovernmental policy.  And you can
> find yourselves having to kowtow to those uses.  :-)
>
> While in the US, we have our channels of recourse and generally the
> government doesn't operate that way.  We hardly know it though.  :-)
>
>
> Seth
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:06 AM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>>>Here's the key to this though: the "more technical" areas have had the
>>>ability to operate in that way because they are in a stewardship
>>>context where governmental inroads have been proscribed. ...
>>
>> Huh.  And I always assumed it was because in neither the parameter
>> nor the number allocations is there a lot of money at stake.
>>
>> R's,
>> John
>>
>> PS: On the other hand, I remember X.400 and GOSIP.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email