IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] CWG draft and its impact on the IETF

Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> Mon, 18 May 2015 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9701AD1D5 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2015 09:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CN5Ep5jaGfHz for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2015 09:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x233.google.com (mail-qc0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 530BB1AD0D7 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2015 09:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qcbgu10 with SMTP id gu10so92001187qcb.2 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2015 09:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=X6DiLxl6uxiizVHLU+U6a6oSKZmjDvz4V7zrXUdxwVk=; b=PBbVvO5Z48NOTlOCeiLNSv9/cJHoGqzK8FtbcSLSwbyzav4zz48PlMmyldnsoY0jjq dFvUWmNnt0scY+p/atXeR5fngZsJSsOrYAJoQvVn1tuuVYztB607RAFodwj0Ub61j546 b3x+atgBwBTigOQpmbqTZBhSOw02r9f0EMuDad/fY/JqfnC6zGA0aRHfJRW9aQyMuqN1 Ehoy+qqfdq6/sw6LeZh80vmiD5xYbRT9O5PCWmsX3FxBQY6GppiZ6gPp/p73VhTU2K3P rFD462r7k7nljObnzZNDUvM+iBgq7G9fz8u8xMgsekz580ihHrAXShUzEWLT3D4rM8B8 FQaA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.38.19 with SMTP id s19mr30711082qgs.14.1431967993464; Mon, 18 May 2015 09:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.157.20 with HTTP; Mon, 18 May 2015 09:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.157.20 with HTTP; Mon, 18 May 2015 09:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ad1d0707ff1b44eb9e48fef18d8e1268@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
References: <5550F809.80200@cisco.com> <55511064.2000300@gmail.com> <CAOW+2dvBb4n4W=q7NoO_V1X+JoqvO1TWYBqPAEseY9T7vybj9Q@mail.gmail.com> <om@mac.com> <59edd953c1d349cfa377bcd72b514b7f@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <C3D17473E06220755959AB78@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <27ed27614a6b47729043610f09ac197f@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <88F741BF3D4C2A597622A70C@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <44A0F230-A98C-4060-88E2-B20FE1DE1FC5@isoc.org> <14ff00ba1aae45f2a8f4befb896e2a08@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <D17525F2-190B-4D00-AEBE-5AD96BA79E79@arin.net> <A026656644A030B7130B94B5@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <ad1d0707ff1b44eb9e48fef18d8e1268@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 17:53:13 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD_dc6gQ_3zdM07r-en9ikWqEbfdhqDTSySVEwj06qvH6vAKNw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
To: Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c139f6948cd405165e0707"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/zuxGTVUewntZW3PCEGUPpcp6I6U>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ianaplan@ietf.org, Olaf Kolkman <kolkman@isoc.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] CWG draft and its impact on the IETF
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 16:53:19 -0000

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 18 May 2015 16:12, "Milton L Mueller" <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
>
>
> As I've said before, there will be an independent-affiliate PTI or there
won't be a transition in the next two years. Take your pick.
>
SO: Milton that sounds quite authoritative and a little threatening to me
;-). The last time I checked, me and you represent just a subset of the
communities working on the transition proposal and none of us actually work
for NTIA. While you have made some important points, I think the last part
above may not be appropriate if you are interested in seeing MS at work.

Regards
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email