Re: [Iasa20] Ballot positions on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 08 July 2019 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D4212023B; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 08:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.247, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D3g-zswVkei8; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 08:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f51.google.com (mail-io1-f51.google.com [209.85.166.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAFA9120287; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 08:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f51.google.com with SMTP id g20so15255376ioc.12; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 08:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cUDkXJHnG85mR6o8QyWf39wSOur642r3U9e/BF5A1h4=; b=BYZhUaQs4PmJ6/CglpVwvIUOq5qmBZXprzWCfsp+a0N1JgSkPSgonppHXygckI3Str Fomzyobi2xizShX6H5GIxL7SmfUYzxCxkKN60bouBxxGJzei0+LFpCWEtr8BE6n/fJlK R31bj7BU18NV/FU06oUe8NS9OXtsx6Hm8GUg1RI/NPH2pCNsTunt+1D3GNU2L0wz+c3/ 3VKS27w67ZqNdoLVLXBKT+eqIvqIWp4mw71/b6SxAolbK52M6NQdpJHS4HkFHrFZlkHS XEVQhTclmXQXcKyBdzlPLnbUrgLHVcdx5oQ5SSha7AJabxSvVy4pIo2nTYxO9uSCp76v 7/Zw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUbcKUKrOs3kG5ItfK7kVhDlHNyiLXIkobdJyEBmk1u5+6YJkGF b7Klta5nnCvhLKRvkXkqW849FCV+YsWD5z9doq8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx6auTsPuoH/1L5fyasucsDh+r4BsSCNYKWwns/wrUwuaRbwR+hLUxB4yTSNlALEVB1x2a1bxtqOuF28xc3uhk=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9613:: with SMTP id w19mr20151117iol.140.1562601302650; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 08:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AC12184D-B315-43B9-8691-EF0F7D901199@cooperw.in> <98cf5edb-29a4-57b0-4e0f-206b6b9c1e5d@gmail.com> <FB091C9A-80C2-440C-964F-D89E7F55F67A@gmail.com> <8fd54995-8f5a-0efb-4d94-c363ea81b286@cs.tcd.ie> <CAHw9_iLDNBp08b=iTZadncvixkoEw-pazmD8B8xW8itzrPFvqQ@mail.gmail.com> <2962D9D5-314D-4E4F-A619-49948D01D3E9@gmail.com> <CALaySJ+eVjbrfFkO1B0ZoGLOyWDwBT2O7Ap4ktt9rH3+U8XAkQ@mail.gmail.com> <6B48AD3B-41B4-499F-B5B8-63BFB88075CB@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6B48AD3B-41B4-499F-B5B8-63BFB88075CB@gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 11:54:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+WMdUwC0UEJ0vt4djRcGDOB2sc7gGMyTjacU3Uxo9zAQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Cc: IASA 2 WG <iasa20@ietf.org>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/-DCREiR-VrEc7r7fIla0r9_Kp5o>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Ballot positions on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions relating to reorganising the IETF administrative structures in the so called “IASA 2.0” project. <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 15:55:07 -0000

> > I see a huge difference between not considering changes to the process
> > (and oversight and steering)... and not considering editorial changes
> > that correct or clarify existing text.  Clearly, not everyone agrees
> > with me on that, but it's part of the job to which I've been appointed
> > to review documents for correctness and clarity, and to call out areas
> > where I think the documents fail.
>
> If we want to make a lot of changes, then I think it will need at least another IETF last call

That's up to Alissa's judgment as responsible AD, but for my part, I
think changes for clarity and editorial correctness generally would
not need that.  I've suggested a lot of very small changes, but each
is individually... very small, and purely editorial.

I updated my ballot this morning to bubble up the editorial
suggestions that relate to the IASA changes, so it should be easier
for you to find them.  Some definitely have to be made, such as some
places where the document needed to be updated for "LLC Director and
IETF Trust", and it was missed.

> or given the other NomCom related issues being discussed recently, a new w.g.

Oh, my... yes, I think we *will* need a new WG for those, but I do NOT
mean to suggest any changes of that nature here!

Barry