IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iasa20] AD review of draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-04

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Mon, 25 February 2019 07:03 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD404130E0A for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 23:03:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=arJVpGiU; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=dX/5z0DV
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6_kPm8_p82dg for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 23:03:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F50C130E25 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 23:03:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E43221E9; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 02:03:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 25 Feb 2019 02:03:12 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=P zLSvyPiqa5SwhtqV63g1YbogMLEIxTEjcRBpDVd1Nw=; b=arJVpGiUSzaVZjPVr VQJyG6HyNEM/q78R2pM66GwTfqWqBc41dr7Uk5gueUBmtNfgG8wMW4aguWJ2AmVZ 5cT7Z+aTRQY3/nZw//bz62HM1XwuPPP1WEKg60zO+5ZasjpMUQxTEBAS911G0Uy/ GZsKY6clCOdHDsA2Spd/8ru65ar+7gZrZo4e86JfrTN/bUHLpwRO/1JNX5dqfMhT iD4OmWo7LPmza8mi69CpoPilTrUkwus0GznpxkNA5EJ64ZiKUzwFaMqk0wEe6ld6 1dzXR6ba0Egr7a4Nq1Gy/gskEy0sN0TH1HB+DjVuv8WkgShK14IlPsjBx72eQ0J+ mkRUQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=PzLSvyPiqa5SwhtqV63g1YbogMLEIxTEjcRBpDVd1 Nw=; b=dX/5z0DV6kQo+QytzCB56iEOMQQMzhiJ3CNbGIwZ9Ur+fuhl4yacIm5ws cpRFuaNYkYjj1pir18aXESr2H3kMnEe1N6P+8CA1SRB5Nr5PzjrzhJkB7edSF3Bk wgQN1QNcEkngp0o8Fms63eOwI+/69YXMXWXdgs3gUdgkWNtQnQwN3bSh+NGPElAq jZVMdEhJd/ZYq7OGkWGU5tHXmlOxtOR2Wi00rx7xERMJ8AOZPRfZCI/PdjBgThUm 9ktj/wwKmQi4dR2FCPXeOTIE58nSfvaxHmeVrBKMl1hUV1etw/2lMSzgiRnfu+aI ufmSC+OlubC3eyL3e4TLsNpGomOcQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:L5NzXP99hQEwCeQHYiOKeK_dHcX-sexYGvSsdWJ6vuJ7tkq64V5xew>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrudehgdelleculddtuddrgedtledrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomheptehlihhs shgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucfkphepud ejfedrfeekrdduudejrdelgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgr segtohhophgvrhifrdhinhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:L5NzXIp9qnGw9X8uwwJB3ytQJvGzJboYbqXmWMMhLpQnDjfsAxYQaw> <xmx:L5NzXIqNgm4cXdEtbN4FmXBJMsHNvuCDSnkzOUXAMYudLc_TVA9NBg> <xmx:L5NzXD3ONqhTjLEtwmYgF5AWEQ0i4IS65Qi4J0MCPS2jI7md_l4xfg> <xmx:MJNzXAOzO9rMERbRCcYK1YbJKrjc_6kQYZzJNcFoMY68U0r7grBARQ>
Received: from [10.82.183.219] (unknown [173.38.117.94]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 336F110319; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 02:03:11 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <4C24F773-B07A-4017-8880-EFACDB76EC9D@cable.comcast.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 02:03:12 -0500
Cc: IASA 2 WG <iasa20@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3AAC674D-CD1C-4DDD-BA2A-91D3538B935B@cooperw.in>
References: <91A5EFAD-BD9F-435E-B01A-7091B263374D@cooperw.in> <4C24F773-B07A-4017-8880-EFACDB76EC9D@cable.comcast.com>
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/1OIut3fXKnLoxNYpIW7x-15bC_c>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] AD review of draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-04
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions relating to reorganising the IETF administrative structures in the so called “IASA 2.0” project. <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 07:03:16 -0000


> On Feb 24, 2019, at 3:45 PM, Livingood, Jason <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> wrote:
> 
> [JL] I am working on edits now in response to your list. I will comment as/if needed as I go. Here is one:
>> == Section 3.5 ==
>> Since we have an entire document about the IETF-ISOC relationship (draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis), why is this section needed?
> 
> [JL] It is a very short section - a few sentences. The idea was to give a quick sense of the IETF-ISOC relationship at a high level - so folks need not necessarily read the other longer document to see all the details. 

Ok. The issue I see is that we will end up with two documents that say slightly different things, and people who have to interpret this later will wonder whether those distinctions are meaningful. The first paragraph of 3.5 is copied verbatim from 2031bis, so if that text changes before 2031bis is approved, there will be discrepancies. The second paragraph does not seem to come from 2031bis, and IIRC the WG spent quite some time settling on the precise language to use there to describe the legal relationship between the two entities. I would suggest just linking to specific sections of 2031bis so people can find the relevant bits when they need to.

Thanks,
Alissa

> 
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email