IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iasa20] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 08 April 2019 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376B712031D for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=2wHqPljB; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=kbwV6eBV
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zv_9rbX4M3-U for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A7BE1200EC for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 29156 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2019 18:54:22 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=71e2.5cab98de.k1904; bh=W35HHVIvZ4Lr9dqawD6hm1/ZJl/Oo2G6bJk/wpzxkwU=; b=2wHqPljBUa6553o46fjN7ii8oacXl71LIndnmw+pWyHXB4xvK/erTs5XwJodQ/G2/a2GknhkXIDeCH/3Y4EZnNNMACyeftkzQmGrmfXISNiLT0uaz8GG2rEBFxJn/5cpYYxCOY0MnokgFRZP0bLlwCXN6dmN4M/aKHoO9VyMlxcgOBm6Cpoi/S5uF+RPmCBEXIBT3t2uiKsfTGWyzJHDCi6EM2erfE39KECysF8MzXLqIZmBrzjujg76yCukaZST
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=71e2.5cab98de.k1904; bh=W35HHVIvZ4Lr9dqawD6hm1/ZJl/Oo2G6bJk/wpzxkwU=; b=kbwV6eBVlh+2P+tqxVgebb5SbSO1YQRaWaxKx7WsGQIFBxho/+xQf+Kni2fnfl7FmcHwgG8UZYtAczp4ayCZm8xIi0TKaMScwCY/R9vT5fDMZJg4KkspLoAUZF9tah5c53oJe4TdhvUL+NsuOIfp83+A4OEaGOoDOyKD5VKNfZRTR9GvPghnDi/4IEgC4XJjDr9pI3Nu+Wkv1uHCNKe8cF+BScojdf4wwvpWj2O/YhkUxx7ARPkNY/29Lx3rxk5e
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 08 Apr 2019 18:54:21 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id A52782011BCFFC; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:54:20 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 8 Apr 2019 14:54:20 -0400
Message-Id: <20190408185421.A52782011BCFFC@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: iasa20@ietf.org
Cc: ted.ietf@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMB0Q=n_GSbtZF43iU310tZG3T=y0sXAowD6jYQdRdBd=g@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/7Jc0eNIQeg8V7Z_-lJtSEQ3U_Gw>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?= <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 18:54:26 -0000

In article <CA+9kkMB0Q=n_GSbtZF43iU310tZG3T=y0sXAowD6jYQdRdBd=g@mail.gmail.com> you write:
>As Joe noted, they do not have to be members of the IESG at all.  If they
>were appointed while on the IESG and then rotated off by NomCom action,
>they could still serve the remaining year.  Presumably, the IESG would have
>to take that into account when deciding who to select, but it is pretty
>clearly permitted by the document now.

Or they could choose to resign from the LLC if it turned out that they
weren't reappointed to the IESG.

I think the practical difference beween one and two year terms is
pretty minimal since any board member can resign at any time and we
have no idea what the conventions for LLC vs. IESG membership will
be.  So I would leave it alone.  If five years from now it is evident
that there is some glaring fault with two year terms that we didn't
anticipate, we can come back and fix it.

R's,
John

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email