IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iasa20] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 08 April 2019 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87C712032B; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EXFwmyoGk-Ds; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2c.google.com (mail-io1-xd2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9413A1203BC; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2c.google.com with SMTP id v4so11897690ioj.5; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 11:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6hYmJQWMmbnUoEKyTsiYrU94ChxyYuOWBHE03iXLAh8=; b=PWKQwvysSzYJDJHaewGXZ0jJBNZEZWswos46/TQYcTWMLg9Vq1EWgFjOvq0/+AEGbO 3zHcZaadm2HUL3PEx7oHxwJUvyNOH14C+hd8o/znWXXm0HsUlMib64IU49FwxSrkwEWo sQbw+x1zxQG0T3Kv5nR5OklcU2FUGcwWiqrBGOIa7s/R09WPOd3Qr0WiRtvNdxN1mRfD 9FanU0hbPbkt3NFLkKDO84A6hjltpUaZOwkids+nyqVTcYuOoaQtBbNru3C1BeAjEp6r OD7lh9fPlaA+sSo9/G73svi8DqlLLOswqhqP7vQHLtiTroXzE5uHyqOMVn+7G7a11O/D hDNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6hYmJQWMmbnUoEKyTsiYrU94ChxyYuOWBHE03iXLAh8=; b=Zp1ki0+PTiEjGbMKQzprTDfCcrGMWQ9pdDC7x+QmnhVX2yGjdpz6c/l4TPuFJJg36L IRsFTETWt8KKpdJ9B74x9Zwpdylj+BYLt4oT3K9DR1WVLT9oSdVgNeOWx3Pgh46XlQbW Uj+Lkfxu0ME3JQaXJxf+WmzNuPZEcQyk4Vgirb81AqBxsFFDR9eSnVf0KJDzK36t2twG eBm6b6qwZGSqWlUcSEic6rLcJDvnWieXytBdGA5JaCN+N+oAfDkIjMvbcuKi274GqrpV wBU8e4wnX30DK6bDzF0ZAlc9NOn4P0im7bJo/JN0fugkBH1+/f+GurUqVDOvrCKaBHuI K4Yw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU57AT8H7DGut9DvKVF9TzXXYpEvV5CbmVaohwqmHMzvYHhg2aB t4GiS1k2FpAkKDWQS4T/Ir+Uirwj4a/M/Gn3bJo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxsECoyDppR63dU/2tDjgpnyvvpb992hmSeX3vSe2nbR9hUgHKHVAOuKBGW7Vw1q5bF8YZE2FjemXOEjc78T/E=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9715:: with SMTP id h21mr6679649iol.266.1554747374764; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 11:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155470226964.18209.2289908384768506570.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+9kkMB40Op1igA4emnkB=XWdj7ZzuUrK_5nTWBnW928FVW9pg@mail.gmail.com> <0B892B67-6402-4898-A041-C232CA4A2E35@vigilsec.com> <CA+9kkMBNVEFZQWO8c8g2AARZ7xidZLYGF1BhJnXvULkzrPBkSA@mail.gmail.com> <803F101C-F519-446D-A660-73B9EDE4CB56@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <803F101C-F519-446D-A660-73B9EDE4CB56@vigilsec.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:15:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMB0Q=n_GSbtZF43iU310tZG3T=y0sXAowD6jYQdRdBd=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis@ietf.org, Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>, IASA 2 WG <iasa20@ietf.org>, iasa2-chairs@ietf.org, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fd0bb7058608d4f6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/8Kuygu0mfX36vQv1qyupbeib3hs>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?= <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 18:16:25 -0000

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 11:01 AM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

>
> Yes, I agree that the length of the term was discussed.  I do no recall
> this aspect being discussed.
>
> At least one board seat will change every year.  If the two-year term
> stands, then only half of the IESG can be considered for the seat, and that
> would be the people that have the same IESG term as the IETF Chair.  The
> other half cannot be sure that they will still be on the IESG for a full
> two years.
>
>
As Joe noted, they do not have to be members of the IESG at all.  If they
were appointed while on the IESG and then rotated off by NomCom action,
they could still serve the remaining year.  Presumably, the IESG would have
to take that into account when deciding who to select, but it is pretty
clearly permitted by the document now.

Ted

> Russ
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email