Re: [Iasa20] employees and contractors in 6635bis

The ISOC, when I was on it, worked with the HR people at ISOC to make 
sure that we stayed well clear of accidentally turning the RSE into an 
employee.  While it introduced some complications, most of those were 
involved in understanding the rules.  Which are needed no matter what 
you do.

Just for clarity, the reason for the care was that none of the RSE, 
ISOC, or the RSOC (or presumably the IAB whose policy direction the RSOC 
follows) wanted the RSE to be an employee.  Which is consistent with the 
wording in the RFC approved by the community.

Yours,
Joel

On 4/30/19 8:11 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
...
> Without taking a position on the nature of the RSE, I'm not sure
> that you and John mean the same thing when you say "like an
> employee". See, for instance:
> https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/understanding-employee-vs-contractor-designation
> 
> Note that the questions here are not largely about how *we* think of
> the role but rather about the structure of the work and of the relationship.
> 
> -Ekr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> iasa20 mailing list
> iasa20@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20
> 