Re: [Iasa20] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 25 June 2019 07:32 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3507120113; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WQrMglDHNJqY; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f47.google.com (mail-io1-f47.google.com [209.85.166.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4E8612009E; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f47.google.com with SMTP id k8so1539278iot.1; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cubbTY6A+HI+0qTqOtiZViqOslXI/u5uHG+fi0PRaT0=; b=gjLzrpQasPiF6ztDXboVhdkPF1yA4l0FdRirVZamCNLQVw4/pOWOqdiGUSusOpz2Qm 7V6o3t224bmFY6yr/wYzbg9WY5JpctDZejK2pMIpil4r7oIxS49oUUo65/EK8NXxTqF9 VMPharCq6V9AJt33ABSNG5lBEDX6+ZD1ifx8rQvtcwJK5o4tqEa36IJyXbmIVBYDf9Uf eeF7rUqkra5deATpc4w+/NluKXQ7lm7+lMzbrjV+VpPG8VpmGJi8y5tifYHz224xXtun Dc5bgaQ4o1OsZ7dQN6yASiCSaFiLVGqRi/nvBnAQtzeJexN+lCw4lIlDYDRrxT30T/RM SjnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXoeM2ltOnHez02OcSOjtmWTnshiucTBlhhwoRkg4i3gAdqEmD1 ztrLKHm8AYX4x6diQ4sUTj5YoOnI2XFKe4zmdqU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxlHyrC8U5M2fDZ8rFT+r/n89NmCfmsDYw/IYHkInAa3Q4r3dbwSO/cVPcS2RNmxP3okLgiIzr02zbtiibONws=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:c80d:: with SMTP id p13mr30369305jao.59.1561447974549; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156141779186.17522.6942767062911073521.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F398538C7FFBD726780807DD@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <F398538C7FFBD726780807DD@PSB>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:32:43 +0100
Message-ID: <CALaySJKhfxYNq-F0tuBAPb1cTAAo_DfZNLxfaC0mLsi8Kuy9EA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@team.neustar>, IASA 2 WG <iasa20@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis@ietf.org, iasa2-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/DZyFu4hg8eGCwtbdyFs7XA0JxLY>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?= <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:32:57 -0000

Thanks, John, for adding to the discussion.  One thing:

> > — Section 4.14 —
> >
> >    Members of the IETF community must have attended at least
> > three of    the last five IETF meetings in order to volunteer.
> >
> > I hesitate to say this, given other ongoing discussions, but
> > "attended at least three of the last five IETF meetings in
> > person in order to volunteer" has to be clear here,
> > especially as we now have formal registration for remote
> > participants.
>
> (2) The hesitation is, IMO, appropriate.  Changes and
> clarifications to the procedures that are unrelated to IASA 2.0,
> especially substantive ones (which that is) are either out of
> scope or they are not.   If they are not in scope, then the IESG
> making a change that the WG was not allowed to make seems highly
> inappropriate.

I don't think what I'm suggesting is a change, but a clarification.
The intent of the current three-of-five policy is in-person
attendance, and there was no need to say that when that was the only
way to attend.  While I fully think that we should change that and
include remote participants for eligibility, this document is
addressing the current rules, which don't include them.

I strongly hope that we change that soon.  But I do think it's
important to get this document out there now, to finish the necessary
IASA2 documentation.

Barry